Literature DB >> 11716664

Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening.

J K Barr1, A L Franks, N C Lee, P Herther, M Schachter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about factors that predict ongoing participation in mammography screening at regular intervals. Members of managed care plans have access to this preventive service; yet, many still do not receive it routinely.
METHODS: Using administrative data from HIP Health Plan of New York, a group model HMO, 24,215 women ages 50-80 years identified as having a screening mammogram during the baseline period were followed for 2 years to determine demographic and utilization factors that might be related to having a subsequent mammogram within the recommended time interval.
RESULTS: Of the 24,215 women with an index mammogram, 71.8;pc had a subsequent screening mammogram within 2 years. Women ages 65-74 years and those with Medicare coverage had the highest mammogram rates among the age and coverage categories. Number of primary care and gynecology physician visits was strongly related to having a subsequent mammogram. The average (mean) time between index and subsequent mammogram was 14.4 months.
CONCLUSION: The significance of health plan visits in subsequent mammography underscores the importance of physician-patient communication in a managed care plan and the integration of health plan members into the HMO delivery system. Even in this environment with equal access for all types of coverage, Medicaid members were less likely to receive this preventive service. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716664     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  14 in total

1.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  A matter of race: early-versus late-stage cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Nancy N Baxter; Elizabeth B Habermann; Roger D Feldman; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Stephanie Foster; Barry Flanagan; Andrew Dent
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

5.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

6.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Jessica King
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The impact of Medicaid coverage and reimbursement on access to diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Akash Shah; Zheyang Wu; Howard P Forman; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Sociodemographic gradients in breast and cervical cancer screening in Korea: the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) 2005-2009.

Authors:  Mi Jin Park; Eun-Cheol Park; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun; Hoo-Yeon Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophie Sell Hellmann; Sisse Helle Njor; Elsebeth Lynge; My von Euler-Chelpin; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Ilse Vejborg; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.