Literature DB >> 17694900

The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Elizabeth J Marsh1, Henry L Roediger, Robert A Bjork, Elizabeth L Bjork.   

Abstract

The present article addresses whether multiple-choice tests may change knowledge even as they attempt to measure it. Overall, taking a multiple-choice test boosts performance on later tests, as compared with non-tested control conditions. This benefit is not limited to simple definitional questions, but holds true for SAT II questions and for items designed to tap concepts at a higher level in Bloom's (1956) taxonomy of educational objectives. Students, however, can also learn false facts from multiple-choice tests; testing leads to persistence of some multiple-choice lures on later general knowledge tests. Such persistence appears due to faulty reasoning rather than to an increase in the familiarity of lures. Even though students may learn false facts from multiple-choice tests, the positive effects of testing outweigh this cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694900     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Immediate feedback during academic testing.

Authors:  M L Epstein; B B Epstein; G M Brosvic
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2001-06

2.  The influence of retrieval on retention.

Authors:  M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

5.  Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Henry L Roediger; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09
  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?

Authors:  Kalif E Vaughn; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

4.  An fMRI study of error monitoring in Montessori and traditionally-schooled children.

Authors:  Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; David Sander; Solange Denervaud; Eleonora Fornari; Xiao-Fei Yang; Patric Hagmann
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-07-17

5.  Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Henry L Roediger; Emily Rosenzweig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

6.  Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge.

Authors:  Allison D Cantor; Andrea N Eslick; Elizabeth J Marsh; Robert A Bjork; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

Review 7.  Using Testing as a Learning Tool.

Authors:  Brenda W Yang; Juan Razo; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Neural correlates of reactivation and retrieval-induced distortion.

Authors:  Donna J Bridge; Ken A Paller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Lisa K Fazio; Anna E Goswick
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-08-15

10.  Investigating Whether Transfer of Learning in Pharmacy Students Depends More on Knowledge Storage or Accessibility.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Kimberly Murphy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.