Literature DB >> 26151629

The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Henry L Roediger1, Jeffrey D Karpicke2.   

Abstract

A powerful way of improving one's memory for material is to be tested on that material. Tests enhance later retention more than additional study of the material, even when tests are given without feedback. This surprising phenomenon is called the testing effect, and although it has been studied by cognitive psychologists sporadically over the years, today there is a renewed effort to learn why testing is effective and to apply testing in educational settings. In this article, we selectively review laboratory studies that reveal the power of testing in improving retention and then turn to studies that demonstrate the basic effects in educational settings. We also consider the related concepts of dynamic testing and formative assessment as other means of using tests to improve learning. Finally, we consider some negative consequences of testing that may occur in certain circumstances, though these negative effects are often small and do not cancel out the large positive effects of testing. Frequent testing in the classroom may boost educational achievement at all levels of education.
© 2006 Association for Psychological Science.

Year:  2006        PMID: 26151629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  244 in total

1.  Language Skill Mediates the Relationship Between Language Load and Articulatory Variability in Children With Language and Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Janet Vuolo; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.

Authors:  Adam Congleton; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

3.  Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?

Authors:  Kalif E Vaughn; Katherine A Rawson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

5.  The relationships of working memory, secondary memory, and general fluid intelligence: working memory is special.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Emily M Elliott; Russell A Matthews; B D Hill; Wm Drew Gouvier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

7.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

8.  Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jang; John T Wixted; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; David E Huber
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The "pure-study" learning curve: the learning curve without cumulative testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Megan A Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

10.  The one-trial learning controversy and its aftermath: remembering Rock (1957).

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Kathleen M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.