Literature DB >> 20921107

Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction.

Bridgid Finn1, Janet Metcalfe.   

Abstract

Scaffolded feedback was tested against three other feedback presentation methods (standard corrective feedback, minimal feedback, and answer-until-correct multiple-choice feedback) over both short- and long-term retention intervals in order to assess which method would produce the most robust gains in error correction. Scaffolded feedback was a method designed to take advantage of the benefits of retrieval practice by providing incremental hints until the correct answer could be self-generated. In Experiments 1 and 3, on an immediate test, final memory for the correct answer was lowest for questions given minimal feedback, moderate for the answer-until-correct condition, and equally high in the scaffolded feedback condition and the standard feedback condition. However, tests of the maintenance of the corrections over a 30-min delay (Experiment 2) and over a 1-day delay (Experiment 3) demonstrated that scaffolded feedback gave rise to the best memory for the correct answers at a delay.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921107     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

1.  Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Gregory Zarow; Baylor Triplett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.

Authors:  Mark A Wheeler; Michael Ewers; Joseph F Buonanno
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003-11

3.  The generation effect: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sharon Bertsch; Bryan J Pesta; Richard Wiscott; Michael A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

4.  The effects of tests on learning and forgetting.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Harold Pashler; John T Wixted; Edward Vul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

5.  The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children.

Authors:  M Sidman; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The role of tutoring in problem solving.

Authors:  D Wood; J S Bruner; G Ross
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

Authors:  B Butterfield; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The mnemonic mechanisms of errorless learning.

Authors:  Nicole D Anderson; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?

Authors:  Lindsey E Richland; Nate Kornell; Liche Sean Kao
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-09

10.  Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Matthew Jensen Hays; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  14 in total

1.  Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Updating misconceptions: effects of age and confidence.

Authors:  Andrée-Ann Cyr; Nicole D Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

3.  Informing pedagogy through the brain-targeted teaching model.

Authors:  Mariale Hardiman
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2012-05-03

4.  The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance.

Authors:  Danielle M Sitzman; Matthew G Rhodes; Nate Kornell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

5.  Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Henry L Roediger; Emily Rosenzweig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

6.  Epistemic Curiosity and the Region of Proximal Learning.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bennett L Schwartz; Teal S Eich
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-07-18

7.  People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: did they know it all along?

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Neural correlates of people's hypercorrection of their false beliefs.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Brady Butterfield; Christian Habeck; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: the role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit.

Authors:  Kellie M Mullaney; Shana K Carpenter; Courtney Grotenhuis; Steven Burianek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

10.  Prequestions do not enhance the benefits of retrieval in a STEM classroom.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Shana K Carpenter; Monica H Lamm; Shuhebur Rahman; Patrick I Armstrong; Clark R Coffman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.