Literature DB >> 16248758

The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Henry L Roediger1, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

Multiple-choice tests are commonly used in educational settings but with unknown effects on students' knowledge. The authors examined the consequences of taking a multiple-choice test on a later general knowledge test in which students were warned not to guess. A large positive testing effect was obtained: Prior testing of facts aided final cued-recall performance. However, prior testing also had negative consequences. Prior reading of a greater number of multiple-choice lures decreased the positive testing effect and increased production of multiple-choice lures as incorrect answers on the final test. Multiple-choice testing may inadvertently lead to the creation of false knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248758     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  37 in total

1.  The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Development of a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination.

Authors:  Gregory L Alston; Bryan L Love
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jang; John T Wixted; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; David E Huber
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall.

Authors:  Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

6.  The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Henry L Roediger; Robert A Bjork; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

7.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

9.  The effects of tests on learning and forgetting.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Harold Pashler; John T Wixted; Edward Vul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

10.  Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Henry L Roediger; Emily Rosenzweig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.