Literature DB >> 33574327

An fMRI study of error monitoring in Montessori and traditionally-schooled children.

Mary Helen Immordino-Yang1,2, David Sander3,4, Solange Denervaud5,6,7, Eleonora Fornari8, Xiao-Fei Yang1, Patric Hagmann9.   

Abstract

The development of error monitoring is central to learning and academic achievement. However, few studies exist on the neural correlates of children's error monitoring, and no studies have examined its susceptibility to educational influences. Pedagogical methods differ on how they teach children to learn from errors. Here, 32 students (aged 8-12 years) from high-quality Swiss traditional or Montessori schools performed a math task with feedback during fMRI. Although the groups' accuracies were similar, Montessori students skipped fewer trials, responded faster and showed more neural activity in right parietal and frontal regions involved in math processing. While traditionally-schooled students showed greater functional connectivity between the ACC, involved in error monitoring, and hippocampus following correct trials, Montessori students showed greater functional connectivity between the ACC and frontal regions following incorrect trials. The findings suggest that pedagogical experience influences the development of error monitoring and its neural correlates, with implications for neurodevelopment and education.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33574327     DOI: 10.1038/s41539-020-0069-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn        ISSN: 2056-7936


  57 in total

1.  Surprise and error: common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Claudia Danielmeier; J Bruce Morton; Markus Ullsperger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Claudia Danielmeier; Gerhard Jocham
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas.

Authors:  Claudia Danielmeier; Tom Eichele; Birte U Forstmann; Marc Tittgemeyer; Markus Ullsperger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Learning versus performance: an integrative review.

Authors:  Nicholas C Soderstrom; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies.

Authors:  P-Y Oudeyer; J Gottlieb; M Lopes
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  What's working in working memory training? An educational perspective.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Zach Shipstead; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Monica Melby-Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 7.  The anterior cingulate gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation.

Authors:  Michael I Posner; Mary K Rothbart; Brad E Sheese; Yiyuan Tang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Thomas S Redick; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-07

Review 9.  Mistakes were made: neural mechanisms for the adaptive control of action initiation by the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Mark Laubach; Marcelo S Caetano; Nandakumar S Narayanan
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2015-01-28

10.  To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas.

Authors:  Mathias Benedek; Emanuel Jauk; Andreas Fink; Karl Koschutnig; Gernot Reishofer; Franz Ebner; Aljoscha C Neubauer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.