Literature DB >> 19404621

Preservation of crossmodal selective attention in healthy aging.

Christina E Hugenschmidt1, Ann M Peiffer, Thomas P McCoy, Satoru Hayasaka, Paul J Laurienti.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to determine if older adults benefited from attention to a specific sensory modality in a voluntary attention task and evidenced changes in voluntary or involuntary attention when compared to younger adults. Suppressing and enhancing effects of voluntary attention were assessed using two cued forced-choice tasks, one that asked participants to localize and one that asked them to categorize visual and auditory targets. Involuntary attention was assessed using the same tasks, but with no attentional cues. The effects of attention were evaluated using traditional comparisons of means and Cox proportional hazards models. All analyses showed that older adults benefited behaviorally from selective attention in both visual and auditory conditions, including robust suppressive effects of attention. Of note, the performance of the older adults was commensurate with that of younger adults in almost all analyses, suggesting that older adults can successfully engage crossmodal attention processes. Thus, age-related increases in distractibility across sensory modalities are likely due to mechanisms other than deficits in attentional processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404621      PMCID: PMC2952884          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1816-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Subjective straight-ahead during neck muscle vibration: effects of ageing.

Authors:  M Strupp; V Arbusow; C Borges Pereira; M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  An event-related potential evaluation of involuntary attentional shifts in young and older adults.

Authors:  H Gaeta; D Friedman; W Ritter; J Cheng
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  Visual attention and aging.

Authors:  K E Groth; P A Allen
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2000-02-01

Review 4.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The effects of age on late components of the ERP and reaction time.

Authors:  H Bahramali; E Gordon; J Lagopoulos; C L Lim; W Li; J Leslie; J Wright
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 6.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Selective attention modulates visual and haptic repetition priming: effects in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Soledad Ballesteros; José M Reales; Julia Mayas; Morton A Heller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

Authors:  C Spence; M E Nicholls; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

9.  Suppression of multisensory integration by modality-specific attention in aging.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Jennifer L Mozolic; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; David Joyner; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  18 in total

1.  Investigating the spatial and temporal modulation of visuotactile interactions in older adults.

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in auditory and visual interactions in temporal rate perception.

Authors:  Cassandra J Brooks; Andrew J Anderson; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Links between temporal acuity and multisensory integration across life span.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sarah H Baum; Juliane Krueger; Paul A Newhouse; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 6.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Russell S Pierce; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26

8.  Aging and response interference across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Maria J S Guerreiro; Jos J Adam; Pascal W M Van Gerven
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

9.  Compensating for age limits through emotional crossmodal integration.

Authors:  Laurence Chaby; Viviane Luherne-du Boullay; Mohamed Chetouani; Monique Plaza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

10.  Susceptibility to a multisensory speech illusion in older persons is driven by perceptual processes.

Authors:  Annalisa Setti; Kate E Burke; Roseanne Kenny; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.