Literature DB >> 20815461

Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Ning Li1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users are unable to receive masking release and the reasons are unclear. The present study examines the hypothesis that when listening to speech in fluctuating maskers, CI users cannot fuse the pieces of the message over temporal gaps because they are not able to perceive reliably the information carried by obstruent consonants (e.g., stops). To test this hypothesis, CI users were presented with sentences containing clean obstruent segments, but corrupted sonorant segments (e.g., vowels). Results indicated that CI users received masking release at low signal-to-noise ratio levels. Experiment 2 assessed the contribution of acoustic landmarks alone by presenting to CI users noise-corrupted stimuli which had clearly marked vowel/consonant boundaries, but lacking clean obstruent consonant information. These stimuli were created using noise-corrupted envelopes processed using logarithmic compression during sonorant segments and a weakly-compressive mapping function during obstruent segments. Results indicated that the use of segment-dependent compression yielded significant improvements in intelligibility, but no masking release. The results from these experiments suggest that in order for CI users to receive masking release, it is necessary to perceive reliably not only the presence and location of acoustic landmarks (i.e., vowel/consonant boundaries) but also the information carried by obstruent consonants.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20815461      PMCID: PMC2945752          DOI: 10.1121/1.3466845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?

Authors:  B J Kwon; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relative spectral change and formant transitions as cues to labial and alveolar place of articulation.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Rithika Saripella; Philipos C Loizou; Linda Thibodeau; Jennifer A Alford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure.

Authors:  Nima Yousefian; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.