Literature DB >> 17671343

Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Lee-Jane W Lu1, Thomas K Nishino, Tuenchit Khamapirad, James J Grady, Morton H Leonard, Donald G Brunder.   

Abstract

Breast density (the percentage of fibroglandular tissue in the breast) has been suggested to be a useful surrogate marker for breast cancer risk. It is conventionally measured using screen-film mammographic images by a labor-intensive histogram segmentation method (HSM). We have adapted and modified the HSM for measuring breast density from raw digital mammograms acquired by full-field digital mammography. Multiple regression model analyses showed that many of the instrument parameters for acquiring the screening mammograms (e.g. breast compression thickness, radiological thickness, radiation dose, compression force, etc) and image pixel intensity statistics of the imaged breasts were strong predictors of the observed threshold values (model R(2) = 0.93) and %-density (R(2) = 0.84). The intra-class correlation coefficient of the %-density for duplicate images was estimated to be 0.80, using the regression model-derived threshold values, and 0.94 if estimated directly from the parameter estimates of the %-density prediction regression model. Therefore, with additional research, these mathematical models could be used to compute breast density objectively, automatically bypassing the HSM step, and could greatly facilitate breast cancer research studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671343      PMCID: PMC2691417          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/16/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.

Authors:  R Highnam; M Brady; R English
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automatic segmentation of mammographic density.

Authors:  R Sivaramakrishna; N A Obuchowski; W A Chilcote; K A Powell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.

Authors:  J J Heine; R P Velthuizen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.

Authors:  C Zhou; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; B Sahiner; L M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms.

Authors:  P K Saha; J K Udupa; E F Conant; D P Chakraborty; D Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.

Authors:  R Klausz; N Shramchenko
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Patient dose in digital mammography.

Authors:  Margarita Chevalier; Pilar Morán; José I Ten; José M Fernández Soto; T Cepeda; Eliseo Vañó
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.

Authors:  J Kaufhold; J A Thomas; J W Eberhard; C E Galbo; D E González Trotter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?

Authors:  Jacques Brisson; Caroline Diorio; Benoît Mâsse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  9 in total

1.  Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography.

Authors:  Brad Keller; Diane Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James Gee; Emily Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

2.  Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James C Gee; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Raleigh F Johnson; Fatima Nayeem; Donald G Brunder; Hyunsu Ju; Morton H Leonard; James J Grady; Tuenchit Khamapirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Shonket Ray; Brad M Keller; Said Pertuz; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.

Authors:  Wenda He; Arne Juette; Erika R E Denton; Arnau Oliver; Robert Martí; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-11

9.  Similarity of fibroglandular breast tissue content measured from magnetic resonance and mammographic images and by a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Fatima Nayeem; Hyunsu Ju; Donald G Brunder; Manubai Nagamani; Karl E Anderson; Tuenchit Khamapirad; Lee-Jane W Lu
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-07-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.