Literature DB >> 11439475

Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.

C Zhou1, H P Chan, N Petrick, M A Helvie, M M Goodsitt, B Sahiner, L M Hadjiiski.   

Abstract

An automated image analysis tool is being developed for the estimation of mammographic breast density. This tool may be useful for risk estimation or for monitoring breast density change in prevention or intervention programs. In this preliminary study, a data set of 4-view mammograms from 65 patients was used to evaluate our approach. Breast density analysis was performed on the digitized mammograms in three stages. First, the breast region was segmented from the surrounding background by an automated breast boundary-tracking algorithm. Second, an adaptive dynamic range compression technique was applied to the breast image to reduce the range of the gray level distribution in the low frequency background and to enhance the differences in the characteristic features of the gray level histogram for breasts of different densities. Third, rule-based classification was used to classify the breast images into four classes according to the characteristic features of their gray level histogram. For each image, a gray level threshold was automatically determined to segment the dense tissue from the breast region. The area of segmented dense tissue as a percentage of the breast area was then estimated. To evaluate the performance of the algorithm, the computer segmentation results were compared to manual segmentation with interactive thresholding by five radiologists. A "true" percent dense area for each mammogram was obtained by averaging the manually segmented areas of the radiologists. We found that the histograms of 6% (8 CC and 8 MLO views) of the breast regions were misclassified by the computer, resulting in poor segmentation of the dense region. For the images with correct classification, the correlation between the computer-estimated percent dense area and the "truth" was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively, for CC and MLO views, with a mean bias of less than 2%. The mean biases of the five radiologists' visual estimates for the same images ranged from 0.1% to 11%. The results demonstrate the feasibility of estimating mammographic breast density using computer vision techniques and its potential to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of breast density estimation in comparison with the subjective visual assessment by radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439475     DOI: 10.1118/1.1376640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  37 in total

1.  Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Berkman Sahiner; Labomir M Hadjiiski; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.

Authors:  D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; S Di Michele; P Tuttobene; C Fantò; M Valentini; M Gentilini; S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  S K Kinoshita; P M Azevedo-Marques; R R Pereira; J A H Rodrigues; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Content-based retrieval of mammograms using visual features related to breast density patterns.

Authors:  Sérgio Koodi Kinoshita; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques; Roberto Rodrigues Pereira; Jośe Antônio Heisinger Rodrigues; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jiazheng Shi; Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Songfeng Li; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Yao Lu; Chuan Zhou; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Man-Kwun I Chau; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Tiffany Tseng; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.