Literature DB >> 15487727

Patient dose in digital mammography.

Margarita Chevalier1, Pilar Morán, José I Ten, José M Fernández Soto, T Cepeda, Eliseo Vañó.   

Abstract

In the present investigation, we analyze the dose of 5034 patients (20,137 images) who underwent mammographic examinations with a full-field digital mammography system. Also, we evaluate the system calibration by analyzing the exposure factors as a function of breast thickness. The information relevant to this study has been extracted from the image DICOM header and stored in a database during a 3-year period (March 2001-October 2003). Patient data included age, breast thickness, kVp, mAs, target/filter combination, and nominal dose values. Entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) without backscatter was calculated from the tube output as measured for each voltage used under clinical conditions and from the tube loading (mAs) included in the DICOM header. Mean values for the patient age and compressed breast thickness were 56 years (SD: 11) and 52 mm (SD: 13), respectively. The majority of the images was acquired using the STD (for standard) automatic mode (98%). The most frequent target/filter combination automatically selected for breast smaller than 35 mm was Mo/Mo (75%); for intermediate thicknesses between 35 and 65 mm, the combinations were Mo/Rh (54%) and Rh/Rh (38.5%); Rh/Rh was the combination selected for 91% of the cases for breasts thicker than 65 mm. A wide kVp range was observed for each target/filter combination. The most frequent values were 28 kVp for Mo/Mo, 29 kVp for Mo/Rh, and 29 and 30 kV for Rh/Rh. Exposure times ranged from 0.2 to 4.2 s with a mean value of 1.1 s. Average glandular doses (AGD) per exposure were calculated by multiplying the ESAK values by the conversion factors tabulated by Dance for women in the age groups 50 to 64 and 40 to 49. This approach is based on the dependence of breast glandularity on breast thickness and age. The total mean average glandular dose (AGD(T)) was calculated by summing the values associated with the pre-exposure and with the main exposure. Mean AGD(T) per exposure was 1.88 mGy (CI 0.01) and the mean AGD(T) per examination was 3.8 mGy, with 4 images per examination on average. The mean dose for cranio-caudal view (CC) images was 1.8 mGy, which is lower than that for medio-lateral oblique (MLO) view because the thickness for CC images was on average 10% lower than that for MLO images. Mean AGD(T) for the oldest group of women (1.90) was 3% higher than the AGD(T) for the younger group (1.85) due to the larger compressed breast thickness of women in the older group (10% on average). Differences between the corresponding AGD(T) values of each age group were lowest for breast thicknesses in the range 40-60 mm, being slightly higher for the women in the older group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15487727     DOI: 10.1118/1.1784591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  A method for calculating the dose length product from CT DICOM images.

Authors:  I A Tsalafoutas; S I Metallidis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.

Authors:  J B McCullagh; P Baldelli; N Phelan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.

Authors:  Hilde Bosmans; An De Hauwere; Kim Lemmens; Federica Zanca; Hubert Thierens; Chantal Van Ongeval; Koen Van Herck; Andre Van Steen; Patrick Martens; Luc Bleyen; Gretel Vande Putte; Eliane Kellen; Griet Mortier; Erik Van Limbergen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  Dosimetry and image quality assessment in a direct radiography system.

Authors:  Bruno Beraldo Oliveira; Marcio Alves de Oliveira; Lucas Paixão; Maria Helena Araújo Teixeira; Maria do Socorro Nogueira
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

9.  Monte Carlo derivation of filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra for dose computation in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucas Paixão; Bruno Beraldo Oliveira; Carolina Viloria; Marcio Alves de Oliveira; Maria Helena Araújo Teixeira; Maria do Socorro Nogueira
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

10.  Comparison of Mean Glandular Dose between Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Kar Choon Teoh; Hanani Abdul Manan; Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin; Iqbal Hussain Rizuana
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.