Literature DB >> 17651005

Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.

Monika Kiss1, Brian A Goolsby, Jane E Raymond, Kimron L Shapiro, Laetitia Silvert, Anna C Nobre, Nickolaos Fragopanagos, John G Taylor, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

Links between attention and emotion were investigated by obtaining electrophysiological measures of attentional selectivity together with behavioral measures of affective evaluation. Participants were asked to rate faces that had just been presented as targets or distractors in a visual search task. Distractors were rated as less trustworthy than targets. To study the association between the efficiency of selective attention during visual search and subsequent emotional responses, the N2pc component was quantified as a function of evaluative judgments. Evaluation of distractor faces (but not target faces) covaried with selective attention. On trials where distractors were later judged negatively, the N2pc emerged earlier, demonstrating that attention was strongly biased toward target events, and distractors were effectively inhibited. When previous distractors were judged positively, the N2pc was delayed, indicating unfocused attention to the target and less distractor suppression. Variations in attentional selectivity across trials can predict subsequent emotional responses, strongly suggesting that attention is closely associated with subsequent affective evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17651005      PMCID: PMC2397542          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Emotion.

Authors:  J T Cacioppo; W L Gardner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations.

Authors:  D O Bahcall; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces.

Authors:  J S Winston; B A Strange; J O'Doherty; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

Authors:  J D Eastwood; D Smilek; P M Merikle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

7.  Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: an fMRI analysis.

Authors:  P J Lang; M M Bradley; J R Fitzsimmons; B N Cuthbert; J D Scott; B Moulder; V Nangia
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Mark J Fenske; Jane E Raymond; Klaus Kessler; Nikki Westoby; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-10

10.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  23 in total

1.  Perception of facial expression depends on prior attention.

Authors:  Julia Gómez-Cuerva; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.

Authors:  Brian A Goolsby; Kimron L Shapiro; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

3.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.

Authors:  Rachel L Driscoll; Keelia Quinn de Launay; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; John P O'Doherty; Michael M Berkebile; David Linderman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-10-13

6.  Selective attention to real-world objects drives their emotional appraisal.

Authors:  Nathan J Wispinski; Shihao Lin; James T Enns; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.

Authors:  René San Martín; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Scott A Huettel; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.

Authors:  David De Vito; Anne E Ferrey; Mark J Fenske; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?

Authors:  Ellen Seiss; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.