Literature DB >> 16181435

Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces.

Mark J Fenske1, Jane E Raymond, Klaus Kessler, Nikki Westoby, Steven P Tipper.   

Abstract

Visual attention studies often rely on response time measures to show the impact of attentional facilitation and inhibition. Here we extend the investigation of the effects of attention on behavior and show that prior attentional states associated with unfamiliar faces can influence subsequent social-emotional judgments about those faces. Participants were shown pairs of face images and were asked to withhold a response if a transparent stop-signal cue appeared over one of the faces. This served to associate the cued face with an inhibitory state. Later, when asked to make social-emotional choices about these face pairs, participants chose uncued faces more often than cued faces as "more trustworthy" and chose cued faces more often than uncued faces as "less trustworthy." For perceptual choices, there was no effect of how the question was framed (which face is "on a lighter background" vs. "on a darker background"). These results suggest that attentional inhibition can be associated with socially relevant stimuli, such as faces, and can have specific, deleterious effects on social-emotional judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16181435     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

1.  Perception of facial expression depends on prior attention.

Authors:  Julia Gómez-Cuerva; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.

Authors:  Rachel L Driscoll; Keelia Quinn de Launay; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; John P O'Doherty; Michael M Berkebile; David Linderman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-10-13

Review 5.  Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder; Marco Steinhauser; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

6.  Suppressing a motivationally-triggered action tendency engages a response control mechanism that prevents future provocation.

Authors:  Scott M Freeman; Dominic Alvernaz; Alexandra Tonnesen; David Linderman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at.

Authors:  Andrew P Bayliss; Matthew A Paul; Peter R Cannon; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze.

Authors:  Amy E Hayes; Matthew A Paul; Boukje Beuger; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-09-25

9.  Attentional modulation of emotional conflict processing with flanker tasks.

Authors:  Pingyan Zhou; Xun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Brian A Goolsby; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Laetitia Silvert; Anna C Nobre; Nickolaos Fragopanagos; John G Taylor; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.