Literature DB >> 28432567

Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.

Rachel L Driscoll1, Keelia Quinn de Launay1, Mark J Fenske2.   

Abstract

Response inhibition negatively impacts subsequent hedonic evaluations of motivationally relevant stimuli and reduces the behavioral incentive to seek and obtain such items. Here we expand the investigation of the motivational consequences of inhibition by presenting sexually appealing and nonappealing images in a go/no-go task and a subsequent image-viewing task. Each initially obscured image in the viewing task could either be made more visible or less visible by repeatedly pressing different keys. Fewer key presses were made to obtain better views of preferred-sex images when such images had previously been inhibited as no-go items than when previously encountered as noninhibited go items. This finding replicates prior results and is consistent with the possibility that motor-response suppression has lingering effects that include global reductions in all behavioral expression. However, for nonpreferred images, prior inhibition resulted in more key presses to obscure their visibility than when such images had not been inhibited. This novel finding suggests that the motivational consequences of response inhibition are not due to a global brake on action but are instead linked to negative changes in stimulus value that induce corresponding increases in avoidance and decreases in approach.

Keywords:  Affective evaluation; Behavioral motivation; Inhibition; Stimulus value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28432567     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1291-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  37 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Reda Badry; Tatsuya Mima; Toshihiko Aso; Masahiro Nakatsuka; Mitsunari Abe; Dina Fathi; Nageh Foly; Hamdy Nagiub; Takashi Nagamine; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition.

Authors:  Katrijn Houben; Chantal Nederkoorn; Reinout W Wiers; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Beer à no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition.

Authors:  Katrijn Houben; Remco C Havermans; Chantal Nederkoorn; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

10.  Response inhibition is linked to emotional devaluation: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Jane E Raymond; Nikki Westoby; Anna C Nobre; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.

Authors:  Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Akram Bakkour; Tom Salomon; Daphna Shohamy; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.