Literature DB >> 19145023

Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.

Brian A Goolsby1, Kimron L Shapiro, Jane E Raymond.   

Abstract

Visual stimuli seen previously as distractors in a visual search task are subsequently evaluated more negatively than those seen as targets. An attentional inhibition account for this distractor-devaluation effect posits that associative links between attentional inhibition and to-be-ignored stimuli are established during search, stored, and then later reinstantiated, implying that distractor devaluation may require visual working memory (WM) resources. To assess this, we measured distractor devaluation with and without a concurrent visual WM load. Participants viewed a memory array, performed a simple search task, evaluated one of the search items (or a novel item), and then viewed a memory test array. Although distractor devaluation was observed with low (and no) WM load, it was absent when WM load was increased. This result supports the notions that active association of current attentional states with stimuli requires WM and that memory for these associations plays a role in affective response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145023     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Long-term inhibition of return of attention.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper; Sarah Grison; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-01

4.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  R F Bornstein; P R D'Agostino
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-10

5.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.

Authors:  Mark J Fenske; Jane E Raymond; Melina A Kunar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

Authors:  G F Woodman; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

7.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.

Authors:  W R Kunst-Wilson; R B Zajonc
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

9.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Sei-Hwan Oh; Min-Shik Kim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

10.  Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Brian A Goolsby; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Laetitia Silvert; Anna C Nobre; Nickolaos Fragopanagos; John G Taylor; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  8 in total

1.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Using a Large-scale Neural Model of Cortical Object Processing to Investigate the Neural Substrate for Managing Multiple Items in Short-term Memory.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.

Authors:  David De Vito; Anne E Ferrey; Mark J Fenske; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Cognition-emotion interactions are modulated by working memory capacity in individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Bern G Lee; James A Waltz; Benjamin M Robinson; Jaime K Brown; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

Review 6.  The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Ajay B Satpute; Shir Atzil; Andy P Field; Caitlin Hitchcock; Melissa Black; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Jay Pratt; Susanne Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task.

Authors:  Kazuya Inoue; Nobuya Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.