Literature DB >> 33128216

Selective attention to real-world objects drives their emotional appraisal.

Nathan J Wispinski1, Shihao Lin2,3, James T Enns4, Craig S Chapman3,5.   

Abstract

Attentional manipulations have been shown to influence subsequent evaluations of objects and images. For example, images used as distractors in a visual search task are subsequently rated more negatively than are target images. One powerful manipulation of attention occurs when we plan and execute movements toward objects in our environment. Here, in two experiments, we show that selective attention to real-world objects subsequently improves emotional appraisal of those objects-an effect we term "target appreciation." Participants were presented with abstract images on three-dimensional objects, and were cued to either reach and grasp one of the two objects, or to respond to the cued object with a keyboard. Images presented on target objects were appraised more positively when compared with novel images. In contrast, images associated with obstacles or distractor objects were not appraised differently than novel images, despite the attentional suppression thought to be required to successfully avoid or ignore these objects. We speculate that this automatic appreciation of the objects of selective attention may be adaptive for organisms acting in complex environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; Motor processes; Preferences; Real world; Selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128216     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02177-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  30 in total

Review 1.  The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf; Martin Wolf; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The snooze of lose: Rapid reaching reveals that losses are processed more slowly than gains.

Authors:  Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Jeremy D Wong; Nathan J Wispinski; James T Enns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-06-22

5.  Visual Selection of the Future Reach Path in Obstacle Avoidance.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Rewards teach visual selective attention.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Andrea Perlato; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes.

Authors:  J T Cacioppo; J R Priester; G G Berntson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-07

8.  Mental blocks: fMRI reveals top-down modulation of early visual cortex when obstacles interfere with grasp planning.

Authors:  Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Jody C Culham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  When Far Becomes Near.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Caterina Ansuini; Francesca Capozzi; Barbara Tversky; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-11-19

10.  Development of Visual Motion Perception for Prospective Control: Brain and Behavioral Studies in Infants.

Authors:  Seth B Agyei; F R Ruud van der Weel; Audrey L H van der Meer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.