Literature DB >> 17646189

Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?

C J Martin1.   

Abstract

The effective dose (E) was created to provide a dose quantity that was related to the probability of health detriment due to stochastic effects from exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. E is derived from the weighted sum of doses to tissues that are known to be sensitive to radiation and so can only be derived by calculation. The tissue weighting factors are derived from the extrapolation of epidemiological evidence. E was intended for use in radiation protection, but has found wide application in evaluation of doses for medical exposures involving only parts of the body. More reliance is often placed on E values and risk estimates based on E than the evidence on which it is based can justify. In this paper, the uncertainties in the estimated values of E for a reference patient and the associated risk coefficients are reviewed in order to provide an indication of how much reliance can be placed on E as an indicator of risk for patients. The relative uncertainty in estimated values of E for medical exposures for a reference patient is seen to be about +/-40%. The estimated risk of cancer may be a factor of three higher or lower when applied to a reference patient, and will be more variable when applied to an individual. A set of recommendations relating to the use of E and description of risk for medical exposures is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646189     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/25922439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  92 in total

1.  Exposing exposure: automated anatomy-specific CT radiation exposure extraction for quality assurance and radiation monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Graham I Warden; Cameron E Farkas; Ichiro Ikuta; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose are excellent measures for use in CT quality improvement.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dose exposure in the ITALUNG trial of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT.

Authors:  M Mascalchi; L N Mazzoni; M Falchini; G Belli; G Picozzi; V Merlini; A Vella; S Diciotti; F Falaschi; A Lopes Pegna; E Paci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Exposing exposure: enhancing patient safety through automated data mining of nuclear medicine reports for quality assurance and organ dose monitoring.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Aaron Sodickson; Elliot J Wasser; Graham I Warden; Victor H Gerbaudo; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis.

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Minaxi Dattani; Joseph Farwell; Jane Shekhdar; Emily Tam; Shilpan Patel; Jaspal Juttla; Ian Simcock; James Stirling; Henry Mandeville; Edwin Aird; P Hoskin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.

Authors:  Paul C Shrimpton; Jan T M Jansen; John D Harrison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used.

Authors:  Cristian Candela-Juan; Alegría Montoro; Enrique Ruiz-Martínez; Juan Ignacio Villaescusa; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation.

Authors:  Z Brady; F Ramanauskas; T M Cain; P N Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.