Literature DB >> 17632737

Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery of spinal deformities in 217 patients.

Andreas Eggspuehler1, Martin A Sutter, Dieter Grob, Dezsö Jeszenszky, Jiri Dvorak.   

Abstract

A prospective study was performed on 217 patients who received MIOM during corrective surgery of spinal deformities between March 2000 and December 2005. Aim is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MIOM techniques used to monitor spinal cord and nerve root function during corrective spine surgery. MIOM is becoming an increasingly used method of monitoring function during corrective spine surgery. The combination of monitoring of ascending and descending pathways may provide more sensitive and specific results giving immediate feedback information regarding any neurological deficits during the operation. Intraoperative somatosensory spinal and cerebral evoked potentials combined with continuous EMG and motor evoked potentials of the spinal cord and muscles were evaluated and compared with postoperative clinical neurological changes. A total of 217 consecutive patients with spinal deformities of different aetiologies were monitored by means of MIOM during the surgical procedure. Out of which 201 patients presented true negative findings while one patient presented false negative and three patients presented false positive findings. Twelve patients presented true positive findings where neurological deficit after the operation was predicted. All neurological deficits in those 12 patients recovered completely. The sensitivity of MIOM applied during surgery of spinal deformities has been calculated of 92.3% and the specificity 98.5%. Based upon the results of this study MIOM is an effective method of monitoring the spinal cord and nerve root function during corrective surgery of spinal deformities and consequently improves postoperative results. The Wake-up test for surgical procedure of spinal deformities became obsolete in our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632737      PMCID: PMC2072897          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0427-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  K D Luk; Y Hu; Y W Wong; K M Cheung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Iatrogenic paraplegia in spinal surgery.

Authors:  K-S Delank; H W Delank; D P König; F Popken; S Fürderer; P Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1,017 cases.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Alfred Muller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; M Stewart; G J Quirk; J L Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery.

Authors:  C Vauzelle; P Stagnara; P Jouvinroux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  K F Kothbauer; V Deletis; F J Epstein
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how?

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Matevz J Krzan; Vedran Deletis
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients.

Authors:  Danielle D Langeloo; Arjan Lelivelt; H Louis Journée; Robert Slappendel; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Arnaldo Benini; François Porchet; Alfred Mueller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; E G Dawson; L G Carlson; L E Kanim; J E Sherman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01
View more
  16 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Vedran Deletis; Jiri Dvorak; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; David Macdonald; Alfred Mueller; Francesco Sala; Tetsuya Tamaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Frank Kleinstueck; Tamàs F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Usefulness of multi-channels in intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: multi-center study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kenichi Shinomiya; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Takanori Saito; Masato Takahashi; Shinichiro Taniguchi; Naoya Yamamoto; Kei Yamada; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Sho Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Satomi; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Outcome of L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Ralph T Schär; Martin Sutter; Anne F Mannion; Andreas Eggspühler; Dezsö Jeszenszky; Tamas F Fekete; Frank Kleinstück; Daniel Haschtmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Denis S Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Intra-operative MEP monitoring can work well in the patients with neural axis abnormality.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Qianyu Zhuang; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian; Hong Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Yu Zhao; Shugang Li; Xisheng Weng; Guixing Qiu; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Neurophysiologic monitoring can predict iatrogenic injury during acetabular and pelvic fracture fixation.

Authors:  Manny Porat; Fabio Orozco; Nitin Goyal; Zachary Post; Alvin Ong
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.