Ralph T Schär1,2, Martin Sutter3, Anne F Mannion4, Andreas Eggspühler4, Dezsö Jeszenszky5, Tamas F Fekete5, Frank Kleinstück5, Daniel Haschtmann5. 1. Spine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. ralph.schaer@insel.ch. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. ralph.schaer@insel.ch. 3. Department of Neurology, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. 4. Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Spine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and course of iatrogenic L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). METHODS: Consecutive patients treated for high-grade spondylolisthesis with IONM from 2005 to 2013 were screened for eligibility. Prospectively collected clinical and surgical data as well as radiographic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included, with a mean age of 26.3 (±9.5) years. Mean preoperative L5-S1 slip was 72% (±21%) and was reduced to 19% (±13%) postoperatively. Mean loss of reduction at last follow-up [mean 19 months (±14, range 3-48 months)] was 3% (±4.3%). Rate of new L5 radiculopathy with motor deficit (L5MD) after surgery was 29% (five patients). Four patients fully recovered after 3 months, one patient was lost to neurologic follow-up. IONM sensitivity and specificity for postoperative L5MD was 20 and 100%, respectively. COMI, back pain and leg pain scores showed significant (p < 0.001) improvements at 3 months postoperatively, which were retained up to 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Transient L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis is frequent. With IONM the risk of irreversible L5 radiculopathy is minimal. If IONM signal changes recover, full clinical recovery is expected within 3 months. Overall, patient-reported outcome of reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis showed clinically important improvement.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and course of iatrogenic L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). METHODS: Consecutive patients treated for high-grade spondylolisthesis with IONM from 2005 to 2013 were screened for eligibility. Prospectively collected clinical and surgical data as well as radiographic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included, with a mean age of 26.3 (±9.5) years. Mean preoperative L5-S1 slip was 72% (±21%) and was reduced to 19% (±13%) postoperatively. Mean loss of reduction at last follow-up [mean 19 months (±14, range 3-48 months)] was 3% (±4.3%). Rate of new L5 radiculopathy with motor deficit (L5MD) after surgery was 29% (five patients). Four patients fully recovered after 3 months, one patient was lost to neurologic follow-up. IONM sensitivity and specificity for postoperative L5MD was 20 and 100%, respectively. COMI, back pain and leg pain scores showed significant (p < 0.001) improvements at 3 months postoperatively, which were retained up to 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Transient L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis is frequent. With IONM the risk of irreversible L5 radiculopathy is minimal. If IONM signal changes recover, full clinical recovery is expected within 3 months. Overall, patient-reported outcome of reduction and instrumented fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis showed clinically important improvement.
Authors: Manish K Kasliwal; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Dwight Saulle; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Christopher P Ames; Joseph H Perra Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Christopher J DeWald; Jennifer E Vartabedian; Mary F Rodts; Kim W Hammerberg Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Frank Kleinstueck; Tamàs F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kyle N Kunze; Daniel T Lilly; Jannat M Khan; Philip K Louie; Joseph Ferguson; Bryce A Basques; Michael T Nolte; Christopher J Dewald Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2020-06-30