BACKGROUND: The 256-multislice CT (256MSCT) obtains volumetric data with 128-mm coverage in a single rotation. This coverage allows satisfactory visualization of the whole heart, allowing the 256MSCT to visualize the cardiac chambers and coronary arteries by cine scan without ECG gating. These characteristics provide a solution to the problems of MSCT. Although a wider beam width provides more efficient imaging over a wider coverage area, patient doses with the 256MSCT are of considerable concern. OBJECTIVE: We assessed potential radiation exposure with the 256MSCT in a cardiac CT protocol and compared the results to those with 16- and 64MSCT (collimated 64x0.5mm using 256MSCT). METHODS: Organ or tissue doses were measured in an anthropomorphic phantom under a coronary artery imaging protocol with the 256MSCT in cine scan mode without ECG gating, and with the 16- and 64MSCT in helical scan mode with ECG gating. RESULTS: Average effective doses were 22.8mSv for the 16MSCT, 27.8mSv for the 64MSCT and 14.1mSv for the 256MSCT. The 16- and 64MSCT doses were thus approximately 1.6- and 2.0-fold higher than those of the 256MSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the 256MSCT in cardiac volumetric cine imaging offers lower radiation exposure than 16- and 64MSCT, and suggests the potential of this equipment in single-beat cardiac imaging without ECG gating. This effective dose is acceptable for routine cardiac imaging.
BACKGROUND: The 256-multislice CT (256MSCT) obtains volumetric data with 128-mm coverage in a single rotation. This coverage allows satisfactory visualization of the whole heart, allowing the 256MSCT to visualize the cardiac chambers and coronary arteries by cine scan without ECG gating. These characteristics provide a solution to the problems of MSCT. Although a wider beam width provides more efficient imaging over a wider coverage area, patient doses with the 256MSCT are of considerable concern. OBJECTIVE: We assessed potential radiation exposure with the 256MSCT in a cardiac CT protocol and compared the results to those with 16- and 64MSCT (collimated 64x0.5mm using 256MSCT). METHODS: Organ or tissue doses were measured in an anthropomorphic phantom under a coronary artery imaging protocol with the 256MSCT in cine scan mode without ECG gating, and with the 16- and 64MSCT in helical scan mode with ECG gating. RESULTS: Average effective doses were 22.8mSv for the 16MSCT, 27.8mSv for the 64MSCT and 14.1mSv for the 256MSCT. The 16- and 64MSCT doses were thus approximately 1.6- and 2.0-fold higher than those of the 256MSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the 256MSCT in cardiac volumetric cine imaging offers lower radiation exposure than 16- and 64MSCT, and suggests the potential of this equipment in single-beat cardiac imaging without ECG gating. This effective dose is acceptable for routine cardiac imaging.
Authors: H C Bauknecht; E Siebert; A Dannenberg; G Bohner; C Jach; S Diekmann; C Scheurig; R Klingebiel Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Sang Il Choi; Richard T George; Karl H Schuleri; Eun Ju Chun; Joao A C Lima; Albert C Lardo Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Oliver Klass; Martin Jeltsch; Sebastian Feuerlein; Horst Brunner; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Matthew J Walker; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Martin H K Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Oliver Klass; Matthew Walker; Anne Siebach; Tina Stuber; Sebastian Feuerlein; Markus Juchems; Martin H K Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-11-14 Impact factor: 5.315