Literature DB >> 21153709

Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates.

Yang Hou1, Yong Yue, Wenli Guo, Guoqiang Feng, Tao Yu, Guangwei Li, Mani Vembar, Mark E Olszewski, Qiyong Guo.   

Abstract

To compare image quality and radiation dose estimates for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) obtained with a prospectively gated transaxial (PGT) CT technique and a retrospectively gated helical (RGH) CT technique using a 256-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner and establish an upper limit of heart rate to achieve reliable diagnostic image quality using PGT. 200 patients (135 males, 65 females) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CCTA on a 256-slice MDCT scanner. The PGT patients were enrolled prospectively from January to June, 2009. For each PGT patient, we found the paired ones in retrospective-gating patients database and randomly selected one patient in these match cases and built up the RGH group. Image quality for all coronary segments was assessed and compared between the two groups using a 4-point scale (1: non-diagnostic; 4: excellent). Effective radiation doses were also compared. The average heart rate ± standard deviation (HR ± SD) between the two groups was not significantly different (PGT: 64.6 ± 12.9 bpm, range 45-97 bpm; RGH: 66.7 ± 10.9 bpm, range 48-97 bpm, P = 0.22). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined a cutoff HR of 75 bpm up to which diagnostic image quality could be achieved using the PGT technique (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in assessable coronary segments between the two groups for HR ≤ 75 bpm (PGT: 99.9% [961 of 962 segments]; RGH: 99.8% [1038 of 1040 segments]; P = 1.0). At HR > 75 bpm, the performance of the PGT technique was affected, resulting in a moderate reduction of percentage assessable coronary segments using this approach (PGT: 95.5% [323 of 338 segments]; RGH: 98.5% [261 of 265 segments]; P = 0.04). The mean estimated effective radiation dose for the PGT group was 3.0 ± 0.7 mSv, representing reduction of 73% compared to that of the RGH group (11.1 ± 1.6 mSv) (P < 0.001). Prospectively-gated axial coronary computed tomography using a 256-slice multidetector CT scanner with a 270 ms tube rotation time enables a significant reduction in effective radiation dose while simultaneously providing image quality comparable to the retrospectively gated helical technique. Our experience demonstrates the applicability of this technique over a wider range of heart rates (up to 75 bpm) than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153709     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9760-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

1.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Tobias Krauss; Lotus Desbiolles; André Plass; Michele Genoni; Thomas G Flohr; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Radiation exposure and protection in cardiac catheterization laboratories.

Authors:  S W Miller; F P Castronovo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Y Wang; E Vidan; G W Bergman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Adaptive temporal resolution optimization in helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction.

Authors:  R Manzke; M Grass; T Nielsen; G Shechter; D Hawkes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Duration of diastole and its phases as a function of heart rate during supine bicycle exercise.

Authors:  Charles S Chung; Mustafa Karamanoglu; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 2.  Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way.

Authors:  Jonathon Leipsic; Brett G Heilbron; Cameron Hague
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Suhny Abbara; Marcus Y Chen; Ralph Gentry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

4.  Dual-source coronary CT angiography in patients with high heart rates using a prospectively ECG-triggered axial mode at end-systole.

Authors:  Hee Yeong Kim; Ji Won Lee; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Ji Eun Nam; Byoung Wook Choi; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Image Quality of 256-Slice Computed Tomography for Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Shu-Ping Chao; Jyh-Gang Leu; Wai-Yip Law; Chu-Jen Kuo; Kou-Gi Shyu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.672

6.  Cardiac CT for planning redo cardiac surgery: effect of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction on image quality.

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Gaby Weissman; Mani Vembar; Wm Guy Weigold
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computer-aided CT coronary artery stenosis detection: comparison with human reading and quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Anisha Kranz; Lisa Hartmann; Robert Roehle; Michael Laule; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yang Hou; Yue Ma; Weipeng Fan; Yuke Wang; Mei Yu; Mani Vembar; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

Authors:  D Muenzel; P B Noel; F Dorn; M Dobritz; E J Rummeny; A Huber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Dual-source cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the follow-up of cardiac transplant: comparison of image quality and radiation dose using three different imaging protocols.

Authors:  D Beitzke; V Berger-Kulemann; V Schöpf; S Unterhumer; E Spitzer; G M Feuchtner; M Gyöngyösi; K Uyanik-Uenal; A Zuckermann; C Loewe; F Wolf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.