OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and student acceptance of using a human patient simulation (HPS) training module focused on interdisciplinary teamwork skills. DESIGN: During their second-professional year, all pharmacy students were in enrolled in Principles of Pharmacotherapy 4: Cardiovascular Diseases and Patient Care Lab IV, a problem-based learning course. As part of the patient care laboratory, students participated in a simulated case of an acutely ill patient with a hypertensive emergency. During the simulation, students performed a history and physical examination. They then worked as a team to make treatment recommendations to the nursing and physician staff members. Following the exercise, a facilitated debriefing session was conducted. Students completed satisfaction surveys to assess the quality and effectiveness of the session. ASSESSMENT: Over 98% of students agreed or strongly agreed that they learned material relevant to their current studies. When compared to student lectures, 90% of students felt that they learned clinical patient care better when using a HPS mannequin in simulated patient scenarios. CONCLUSION: HPS-based learning offers a realistic training experience through which clinical knowledge and interpersonal teamwork skills can be taught. Students enjoy the experience and find it relevant to their future practice. Simulation-based training may teach certain topics better than traditional lecture formats and as such could help to fill gaps in the current pharmacy curriculum.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and student acceptance of using a humanpatient simulation (HPS) training module focused on interdisciplinary teamwork skills. DESIGN: During their second-professional year, all pharmacy students were in enrolled in Principles of Pharmacotherapy 4: Cardiovascular Diseases and Patient Care Lab IV, a problem-based learning course. As part of the patient care laboratory, students participated in a simulated case of an acutely ill patient with a hypertensive emergency. During the simulation, students performed a history and physical examination. They then worked as a team to make treatment recommendations to the nursing and physician staff members. Following the exercise, a facilitated debriefing session was conducted. Students completed satisfaction surveys to assess the quality and effectiveness of the session. ASSESSMENT: Over 98% of students agreed or strongly agreed that they learned material relevant to their current studies. When compared to student lectures, 90% of students felt that they learned clinical patient care better when using a HPS mannequin in simulated patient scenarios. CONCLUSION: HPS-based learning offers a realistic training experience through which clinical knowledge and interpersonal teamwork skills can be taught. Students enjoy the experience and find it relevant to their future practice. Simulation-based training may teach certain topics better than traditional lecture formats and as such could help to fill gaps in the current pharmacy curriculum.
Authors: S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; David Lee Gordon; Stephen Symes; Emil R Petrusa; Ian R Hart; Ronald M Harden Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: John C Morey; Robert Simon; Gregory D Jay; Robert L Wears; Mary Salisbury; Kimberly A Dukes; Scott D Berns Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah M Westberg; Jeff Adams; Kathleen Thiede; Timothy P Stratton; Melissa A Bumgardner Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: William F Bond; Lynn M Deitrick; Darryl C Arnold; Marianne Kostenbader; Gavin C Barr; Saron R Kimmel; Charles C Worrilow Journal: Acad Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Amy J Eng; Jennifer M Namba; Kevin W Box; James R Lane; Dennis Y Kim; Daniel P Davis; Jay J Doucet; Raul Coimbra Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Gayle A Brazeau; Susan M Meyer; Michele Belsey; Edward M Bednarczyk; Sanela Bilic; Julie Bullock; Gary E DeLander; E F Fiese; Stephen L Giroux; Danny McNatty; Ruth Nemire; William A Prescott; Andrew P Traynor Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Eric F Egelund; Jane Gannon; Carol Motycka; W Thomas Smith; Dale F Kraemer; Kathleen H Solomon Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Christina L Cox; Timothy J Todd; Lisa Lubsch; Kristin C Klein; William A Prescott; Chad A Knoderer; Peter N Johnson; Rachel Meyers; Justin W Cole; Joseph M LaRochelle; Mary A Worthington; Katherine Smith Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.047