Literature DB >> 17609611

Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

Patricia G Stelmachowicz1, Dawna E Lewis, Sangsook Choi, Brenda Hoover.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that a restricted stimulus bandwidth can have a negative effect upon the perception of the phonemes /s/ and /z/, which serve multiple linguistic functions in the English language. These findings may have important implications for the development of speech and language in young children with hearing loss because the bandwidth of current hearing aids generally is restricted to 6 to 7 kHz. The primary goal of the current study was to expand our previous work to examine the effects of stimulus bandwidth on a wide range of speech materials, to include a variety of auditory-related tasks, and to include the effects of background noise.
DESIGN: Thirty-two children with normal hearing and 24 children with sensorineural hearing loss (7 to 14 yr) participated in this study. To assess the effects of stimulus bandwidth, four different auditory tasks were used: 1) nonsense syllable perception, 2) word recognition, 3) novel-word learning, and 4) listening effort. Auditory stimuli recorded by a female talker were low-pass filtered at 5 and 10 kHz and presented in noise.
RESULTS: For the children with normal hearing, significant bandwidth effects were observed for the perception of nonsense syllables and for words but not for novel-word learning or listening effort. In the 10-kHz bandwidth condition, children with hearing loss showed significant improvements for monosyllabic words but not for nonsense syllables, novel-word learning, or listening effort. Further examination, however, revealed marked improvements for the perception of specific phonemes. For example, bandwidth effects for the perception of /s/ and /z/ were not only significant but much greater than that seen in the group with normal hearing.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results are consistent with previous studies that have shown that a restricted stimulus bandwidth can negatively affect the perception of /s/ and /z/ spoken by female talkers. Given the importance of these phonemes in the English language and the tendency of early caregivers to be female, an inability to perceive these sounds correctly may have a negative impact on both phonological and morphological development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17609611      PMCID: PMC2396880          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  35 in total

1.  Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech.

Authors:  L E Cornelisse; J P Gagnńe; R C Seewald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fast mapping in normal and language-impaired children.

Authors:  C A Dollaghan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-08

4.  Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  M L Rice; J B Oetting; J Marquis; J Bode; S Pae
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

5.  Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  J L Elfenbein; M A Hardin-Jones; J M Davis
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

6.  The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; F N Erickson; L Medwetsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Fast mapping word-learning abilities of language-delayed preschoolers.

Authors:  M L Rice; J C Buhr; M Nemeth
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-02

8.  Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; L Medwetsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments.

Authors:  S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  31 in total

1.  Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian M Kreisman; Annette G Mazevski; Donald J Schum; Ravichandran Sockalingam
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Does harmonicity explain children's cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Michelle Simha; Kelly N Jahn; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of high-frequency energy level changes in speech and singing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Andrew J Lotto; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A randomized controlled trial of nonlinear frequency compression versus conventional processing in hearing aids: speech and language of children at three years of age.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Julia Day; Vicky Zhang; Harvey Dillon; Patricia Van Buynder; Mark Seeto; Sanna Hou; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Thomson; Laura Street; Angela Wong; Lauren Burns; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.