Literature DB >> 7895939

The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech.

A Boothroyd1, F N Erickson, L Medwetsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The long-term goal is to investigate the feasibility of using real speech as a stimulus for electroacoustic evaluation of nonlinear hearing aids. The goals of the present study were to determine the spectral envelope of speech from acoustic measures of phoneme tokens in running speech, to compare the results with published data on long-term average speech spectra, to measure inter-talker differences of spectral envelope, and to explore the extent to which the intensity variation within and across talkers might be minimized by frequency-selective amplification and automatic gain control.
DESIGN: Seven phonemes were selected to represent the extremes of frequency and intensity in English. Recordings were made of five men and five women producing syllable strings constructed from these phonemes. One-third octave spectra were prepared from the phoneme tokens. The frequencies and intensities of 13 key points in these spectra were measured and used to estimate individual and group spectral envelopes.
RESULTS: The group spectral envelope was similar to that derived from published data on the long-term average spectrum of speech, but there were marked intertalker differences. Some of the differences were gender-related. The overall dynamic range of intensity in these data was 53 dB. Frequency-dependent level adjustment (an 11 dB high-frequency boost) reduced this range to 42 dB, and a combination of frequency-dependent and subject-dependent level adjustment (analogous to 2-band automatic gain control) reduced it to 37 dB.
CONCLUSION: A phonemic approach to determining the spectral envelope of speech offers insights that are not available from long-term average spectra and could offer advantages in the evaluation of nonlinear hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7895939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  15 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Multiple looks in speech sound discrimination in adults.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

Review 4.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

5.  Rapid word-learning in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  A L Pittman; D E Lewis; B M Hoover; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.

Authors:  Jianfen Ma; Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard T Penninger; Wade W Chien; Patpong Jiradejvong; Emily Boeke; Courtney L Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

8.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.