Literature DB >> 20457725

Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Brian M Kreisman1, Annette G Mazevski, Donald J Schum, Ravichandran Sockalingam.   

Abstract

This investigation examined whether speech intelligibility in noise can be improved using a new, binaural broadband hearing instrument system. Participants were 36 adults with symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss (18 experienced hearing instrument users and 18 without prior experience). Participants were fit binaurally in a planned comparison, randomized crossover design study with binaural broadband hearing instruments and advanced digital hearing instruments. Following an adjustment period with each device, participants underwent two speech-in-noise tests: the QuickSIN and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). Results suggested significantly better performance on the QuickSIN and the HINT measures with the binaural broadband hearing instruments, when compared with the advanced digital hearing instruments and unaided, across and within all noise conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457725      PMCID: PMC4111507          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810364396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  19 in total

1.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  D A Vickers; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions.

Authors:  Christine M Rankovic
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Determining the importance of fundamental hearing aid attributes.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Isabel Lausberg; Juergen Kiessling; Martin Walger; Hasso von Wedel
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Repeated-measures contrasts for "multiple-pattern" hypotheses.

Authors:  R Michael Furr; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-09

5.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel A McArdle; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes.

Authors:  H Meister; I Lausberg; M Walger; H von Wedel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating.

Authors:  R W Kortekaas; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality.

Authors:  H J Steeneken; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living.

Authors:  Therese C Walden; Brian E Walden
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; L Medwetsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.

Authors:  Anne Gm Schilder; Lee Yee Chong; Saoussen Ftouh; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-19

2.  The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Emily Bates; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Quantitative enhancement of speech in noise through a wireless equipped hearing aid.

Authors:  A Ciorba; S Zattara; G Loroni; S Prosser
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Wendy B Potts; Lakshmish Ramanna; Trevor Perry; Christopher J Long
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility and Sound Localization Abilities with Hearing Aids Using Binaural Wireless Technology.

Authors:  Iman Ibrahim; Vijay Parsa; Ewan Macpherson; Margaret Cheesman
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-12-21

7.  Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.

Authors:  Tatiana Manfrini Garcia; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Effects of Binaural Spatialization in Wireless Microphone Systems for Hearing Aids on Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gilles Courtois; Hervé Lissek; Philippe Estoppey; Yves Oesch; Xavier Gigandet
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Hearing in Noise Test Brazil: standardization for young adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Andressa Forlevise Sbompato; Lilian Cassia Bornia Jacob Corteletti; Adriane de Lima Mortari Moret; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.