Literature DB >> 1397754

Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids.

A Boothroyd1, L Medwetsky.   

Abstract

The purpose was to determine a target for the upper frequency limit of a hearing aid that will provide access to the important spectral cues for all the sounds of English. The sibilant /s/ was studied because of its high-frequency content. Repeated tokens of /s/ were recorded from five men and five women before and between the vowels /u/, /a/, and /i/. Using fast Fourier transform analysis, the prominent spectral peak with the lowest frequency was identified and its center frequency determined for each token. This frequency averaged around 4.9 kHz for the /u/ context, 5.6 kHz for the /a/ context, and 6.0 kHz for the /i/ context. There were dramatic differences among talkers, with subject means ranging from 3.2 to 8.4 kHz. The women generated consistently higher frequency /s/ sounds than the men, but there were also large differences within gender groups. These data suggest that the upper frequency limit of a high-fidelity hearing aid should be in the region of 10 kHz. If this cannot be accomplished with direct amplification, an alternative might be the selective use of frequency transposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1397754     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199206000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  16 in total

1.  Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian M Kreisman; Annette G Mazevski; Donald J Schum; Ravichandran Sockalingam
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech.

Authors:  Marc Caldwell; Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

4.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Dawna E Lewis; Sangsook Choi; Brenda Hoover
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.