Literature DB >> 1758768

Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: testing a theory of face perception.

J W Tanaka1, M J Farah.   

Abstract

Recognition of faces is more severely impaired by inversion than is recognition of other types of objects. This was originally interpreted as evidence for the existence of special face-recognition mechanisms. Recently, Diamond and Carey (1986) attributed the inversion effect to the use of second-order relational properties that are important for, but not unique to, face recognition. According to their hypothesis, face recognition differs from the recognition of most other objects in its dependence on second-order relational properties. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments by comparing the effects of inversion on the identification of dot patterns that differed in the extent to which they required the encoding of second-order relational properties. Identification of the second-order relational patterns was not more disrupted by inversion than was identification of first-order patterns. These results fail to support the hypothesis that second-order relational properties are responsible for the inversion effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1758768     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recognizing faces.

Authors:  H D Ellis
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1975-11

Review 2.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1988-11

3.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

4.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

5.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability?

Authors:  R K Yin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.

Authors:  S Carey; R Diamond
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition.

Authors:  J Morton; M H Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: a test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.

Authors:  M J Wenger; J T Townsend
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  Activation of face expertise and the inversion effect.

Authors:  Liezhong Ge; Zhe Wang; Joseph P McCleery; Kang Lee
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-01

3.  Effects of identical context on visual pattern recognition by pigeons.

Authors:  Francisco J Donis; Sheila Chase; Eric G Heinemann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Features and their configuration in face recognition.

Authors:  J W Tanaka; J A Sengco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

6.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Upright versus upside-down faces: how interface attractiveness varies with orientation.

Authors:  K H Bäuml
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

8.  Behavioral and neural evidence of increased attention to the bottom half of the face in deaf signers.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Susan M Letourneau; Melissa C T Maslin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.