Literature DB >> 15971496

Effects of identical context on visual pattern recognition by pigeons.

Francisco J Donis1, Sheila Chase, Eric G Heinemann.   

Abstract

The effects of identical context on pattern recognition by pigeons for outline drawings of faces were investigated by training pigeons to identify (Experiment 1) and categorize (Experiment 2) these stimuli according to the orientation of the mouth-an upright U shape representing a smiling mouth or an inverted U shape representing a sad mouth. These target stimuli were presented alone (Pair 1), with three dots in a triangular orientation to represent a nose and eyes (Pair 2), and with the face pattern surrounded by an oval (Pair 3). In Experiment 1, the pigeons trained with Pair 1 were most accurate, those trained with Pair 2 were less so, and those trained with Pair 3 failed to acquire the discrimination within eighty 100-trial sessions. The same ordering was found in Experiment 2 for pigeons trained on the three pairs simultaneously. The authors suggest that a contrasting finding in humans, the face superiority effect, might be due to a gain in discriminability resulting from recognition of the pattern as a face. An exemplar model of information processing that excludes linguistic coding accounts for the present results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15971496     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  22 in total

1.  Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons.

Authors:  L J Van Hamme; E A Wasserman; I Biederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1992-10

2.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The mental representation of faces: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  J Davidoff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

5.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The discrimination of mirror-image forms by pigeons.

Authors:  D C Todrin; D S Blough
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

7.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. I. Tachistoscopic visual acuity as a function of distance.

Authors:  S Bloch; C Martinoya
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Debbie M Kelly; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  V D Hollard; J D Delius
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  Processing of conflicting and redundant stimulus information by pigeons.

Authors:  Kumiko Yokoyama; Deena Dailey; Sheila Chase
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

3.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.