Literature DB >> 17586774

Nonbonded terms extrapolated from nonlocal knowledge-based energy functions improve error detection in near-native protein structure models.

Evandro Ferrada1, Francisco Melo.   

Abstract

The accurate assessment of structural errors plays a key role in protein structure prediction, constitutes the first step of protein structure refinement, and has a major impact on subsequent functional inference from structural data. In this study, we assess and compare the ability of different full atom knowledge-based potentials to detect small and localized errors in comparative protein structure models of known accuracy. We have evaluated the effect of incorporating close nonbonded pairwise atom terms on the task of classifying residue modeling accuracy. Since the direct and unbiased derivation of close nonbonded terms from current experimental data is not possible, we extrapolated those terms from the corresponding pseudo-energy functions of a nonlocal knowledge-based potential. It is shown that this methodology clearly improves the detection of errors in protein models, suggesting that a proper description of close nonbonded terms is important to achieve a more complete and accurate description of native protein conformations. The use of close nonbonded terms directly derived from experimental data exhibited a poor performance, demonstrating that these terms cannot be accurately obtained by using the current data and methodology. Some external knowledge-based energy functions that are widely used in model assessment also performed poorly, which suggests that the benchmark of models and the specific error detection task tested in this study constituted a difficult challenge. The methodology presented here could be useful to detect localized structural errors not only in high-quality protein models, but also in experimental protein structures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586774      PMCID: PMC2206707          DOI: 10.1110/ps.062735907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  51 in total

1.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

2.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Y Xia; E S Huang; M Levitt; R Samudrala
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jerry Tsai; Richard Bonneau; Alexandre V Morozov; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-10-01

8.  BMP-1/Tolloid-like metalloproteases process endorepellin, the angiostatic C-terminal fragment of perlecan.

Authors:  Eva M Gonzalez; Charles C Reed; Gregory Bix; Jian Fu; Yue Zhang; Bagavathi Gopalakrishnan; Daniel S Greenspan; Renato V Iozzo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals.

Authors:  A T Hagler; E Huler; S Lifson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1974-08-21       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  R Sánchez; A Sali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely related all-atom statistical energy functions.

Authors:  Yuedong Yang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Evolutionary potentials: structure specific knowledge-based potentials exploiting the evolutionary record of sequence homologs.

Authors:  Alejandro Panjkovich; Francisco Melo; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  StAR: a simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves.

Authors:  Ismael A Vergara; Tomás Norambuena; Evandro Ferrada; Alex W Slater; Francisco Melo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.