Literature DB >> 12945051

An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Jerry Tsai1, Richard Bonneau, Alexandre V Morozov, Brian Kuhlman, Carol A Rohl, David Baker.   

Abstract

We have improved the original Rosetta centroid/backbone decoy set by increasing the number of proteins and frequency of near native models and by building on sidechains and minimizing clashes. The new set consists of 1,400 model structures for 78 different and diverse protein targets and provides a challenging set for the testing and evaluation of scoring functions. We evaluated the extent to which a variety of all-atom energy functions could identify the native and close-to-native structures in the new decoy sets. Of various implicit solvent models, we found that a solvent-accessible surface area-based solvation provided the best enrichment and discrimination of close-to-native decoys. The combination of this solvation treatment with Lennard Jones terms and the original Rosetta energy provided better enrichment and discrimination than any of the individual terms. The results also highlight the differences in accuracy of NMR and X-ray crystal structures: a large energy gap was observed between native and non-native conformations for X-ray structures but not for NMR structures. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12945051     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  57 in total

1.  An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Some fundamental aspects of building protein structures from fragment libraries.

Authors:  J Bradley Holmes; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Database-derived potentials dependent on protein size for in silico folding and design.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Dimitri Gilis; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Self-complementarity within proteins: bridging the gap between binding and folding.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.

Authors:  David Eramian; Min-yi Shen; Damien Devos; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Nonbonded terms extrapolated from nonlocal knowledge-based energy functions improve error detection in near-native protein structure models.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Y Dehouck; D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Exploring protein energy landscapes with hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  Dominik Gront; Ulrich H E Hansmann; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  Int J Quantum Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.444

9.  Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Oliver Lange; Frank Delaglio; Paolo Rossi; James M Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Alexander Eletsky; Yibing Wu; Kiran K Singarapu; Alexander Lemak; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker; Ad Bax
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Explicit orientation dependence in empirical potentials and its significance to side-chain modeling.

Authors:  Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 22.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.