Literature DB >> 12885659

TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.

Yang Zhang1, Andrzej Kolinski, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

We have developed a new combined approach for ab initio protein structure prediction. The protein conformation is described as a lattice chain connecting C(alpha) atoms, with attached C(beta) atoms and side-chain centers of mass. The model force field includes various short-range and long-range knowledge-based potentials derived from a statistical analysis of the regularities of protein structures. The combination of these energy terms is optimized through the maximization of correlation for 30 x 60,000 decoys between the root mean square deviation (RMSD) to native and energies, as well as the energy gap between native and the decoy ensemble. To accelerate the conformational search, a newly developed parallel hyperbolic sampling algorithm with a composite movement set is used in the Monte Carlo simulation processes. We exploit this strategy to successfully fold 41/100 small proteins (36 approximately 120 residues) with predicted structures having a RMSD from native below 6.5 A in the top five cluster centroids. To fold larger-size proteins as well as to improve the folding yield of small proteins, we incorporate into the basic force field side-chain contact predictions from our threading program PROSPECTOR where homologous proteins were excluded from the data base. With these threading-based restraints, the program can fold 83/125 test proteins (36 approximately 174 residues) with structures having a RMSD to native below 6.5 A in the top five cluster centroids. This shows the significant improvement of folding by using predicted tertiary restraints, especially when the accuracy of side-chain contact prediction is >20%. For native fold selection, we introduce quantities dependent on the cluster density and the combination of energy and free energy, which show a higher discriminative power to select the native structure than the previously used cluster energy or cluster size, and which can be used in native structure identification in blind simulations. These procedures are readily automated and are being implemented on a genomic scale.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12885659      PMCID: PMC1303233          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74551-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  31 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR--a new approach to threading.

Authors:  J Skolnick; D Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-02-15

Review 3.  From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding.

Authors:  J E Shea; C L Brooks
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition.

Authors:  A R Panchenko; A Marchler-Bauer; S H Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading?

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; R Najmanovich; E Domany
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-02-01

6.  A surprising simplicity to protein folding.

Authors:  D Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Progress in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  A G Murzin
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-02

8.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  J Pillardy; C Czaplewski; A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; R Kaźmierkiewicz; S Oldziej; W J Wedemeyer; K D Gibson; Y A Arnautova; J Saunders; Y J Ye; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization.

Authors:  D Tobi; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-10-01
View more
  120 in total

1.  SIDEpro: a novel machine learning approach for the fast and accurate prediction of side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Ken Nagata; Arlo Randall; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Wei Li; Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Tertiary structure predictions on a comprehensive benchmark of medium to large size proteins.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Dimensionality reduction in computational demarcation of protein tertiary structures.

Authors:  Rajani R Joshi; Priyabrata R Panigrahi; Reshma N Patil
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Structure prediction and validation of an affibody engineered for cell-specific nucleic acid targeting.

Authors:  Vijaya Gopal; Kunchur Guruprasad
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2011-02-17

8.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Genomics-aided structure prediction.

Authors:  Joanna I Sułkowska; Faruck Morcos; Martin Weigt; Terence Hwa; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A probabilistic and continuous model of protein conformational space for template-free modeling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jian Peng; Joe Debartolo; Karl F Freed; Tobin R Sosnick; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.