Literature DB >> 10329155

Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

T Lazaridis1, M Karplus.   

Abstract

An essential requirement for theoretical protein structure prediction is an energy function that can discriminate the native from non-native protein conformations. To date most of the energy functions used for this purpose have been extracted from a statistical analysis of the protein structure database, without explicit reference to the physical interactions responsible for protein stability. The use of the statistical functions has been supported by the widespread belief that they are superior for such discrimination to physics-based energy functions. An effective energy function which combined the CHARMM vacuum potential with a Gaussian model for the solvation free energy is tested for its ability to discriminate the native structure of a protein from misfolded conformations; the results are compared with those obtained with the vacuum CHARMM potential. The test is performed on several sets of misfolded structures prepared by others, including sets of about 650 good decoys for six proteins, as well as on misfolded structures of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. The vacuum CHARMM potential is successful in most cases when energy minimized conformations are considered, but fails when applied to structures relaxed by molecular dynamics. With the effective energy function the native state is always more stable than grossly misfolded conformations both in energy minimized and molecular dynamics-relaxed structures. The present results suggest that molecular mechanics (physics-based) energy functions, complemented by a simple model for the solvation free energy, should be tested for use in the inverse folding problem, and supports their use in studies of the effective energy surface of proteins in solution. Moreover, the study suggests that the belief in the superiority of statistical functions for these purposes may be ill founded. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10329155     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  78 in total

1.  Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.

Authors:  D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein folding and function: the N-terminal fragment in adenylate kinase.

Authors:  S Kumar; Y Y Sham; C J Tsai; R Nussinov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Understanding beta-hairpin formation.

Authors:  A R Dinner; T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.

Authors:  Y N Vorobjev; J Hermans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis.

Authors:  R Norel; F Sheinerman; D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Use of surface area computations to describe atom-atom interactions.

Authors:  X de La Cruz; M Calvo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Proteins wriggle.

Authors:  Michael Cahill; Sean Cahill; Kevin Cahill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.