Literature DB >> 17586669

Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.

Jennifer A Ufnar1, David F Ufnar, Shiao Y Wang, R D Ellender.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate methanogen diversity in animal hosts to develop a swine-specific archaeal molecular marker for fecal source tracking in surface waters. Phylogenetic analysis of swine mcrA sequences compared to mcrA sequences from the feces of five animals (cow, deer, sheep, horse, and chicken) and sewage showed four distinct swine clusters, with three swine-specific clades. From this analysis, six sequences were chosen for molecular marker development and initial testing. Only one mcrA sequence (P23-2) showed specificity for swine and therefore was used for environmental testing. PCR primers for the P23-2 clone mcrA sequence were developed and evaluated for swine specificity. The P23-2 primers amplified products in P23-2 plasmid DNA (100%), pig feces (84%), and swine waste lagoon surface water samples (100%) but did not amplify a product in 47 bacterial and archaeal stock cultures and 477 environmental bacterial isolates and sewage and water samples from a bovine waste lagoon and a polluted creek. Amplification was observed in only one sheep sample out of 260 human and nonswine animal fecal samples. Sequencing of PCR products from pig feces demonstrated 100% similarity to pig mcrA sequence from clone P23-2. The minimal amount of DNA required for the detection was 1 pg for P23-2 plasmid, 1 ng for pig feces, 50 ng for swine waste lagoon surface water, 1 ng for sow waste influent, and 10 ng for lagoon sludge samples. Lower detection limits of 10(-6) g of wet pig feces in 500 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and 10(-4) g of lagoon waste in estuarine water were established for the P23-2 marker. This study was the first to utilize methanogens for the development of a swine-specific fecal contamination marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586669      PMCID: PMC1950972          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00319-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

Review 1.  Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation.

Authors:  H Ochman; J G Lawrence; E A Groisman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill.

Authors:  Philip E Luton; Jonathan M Wayne; Richard J Sharp; Paul W Riley
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium ruminantium n. sp.

Authors:  P H SMITH; R E HUNGATE
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces.

Authors:  C Andrew Carson; Jessica M Christiansen; Helen Yampara-Iquise; Verel W Benson; Claire Baffaut; Jerri V Davis; Robert R Broz; William B Kurtz; Wendi M Rogers; William H Fales
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Characterisation of the microbial diversity in a pig manure storage pit using small subunit rDNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  Raúl Snell-Castro; Jean-Jacques Godon; Jean-Philippe Delgenès; Patrick Dabert
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 4.194

7.  Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA.

Authors:  L Ovreås; L Forney; F L Daae; V Torsvik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  M F Whitford; R M Teather; R J Forster
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L A Khatib; Y L Tsai; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Enumeration of selected anaerobic bacterial groups in cecal and colonic contents of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  T J Butine; J A Leedle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  13 in total

1.  "Methanoplasmatales," Thermoplasmatales-related archaea in termite guts and other environments, are the seventh order of methanogens.

Authors:  Kristina Paul; James O Nonoh; Lena Mikulski; Andreas Brune
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Molecular indicators used in the development of predictive models for microbial source tracking.

Authors:  Elisenda Ballesté; Xavier Bonjoch; Lluís A Belanche; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Source tracking swine fecal waste in surface water proximal to swine concentrated animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Christopher D Heaney; Kevin Myers; Steve Wing; Devon Hall; Dothula Baron; Jill R Stewart
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Methanobrevibacter ruminantium as an indicator of domesticated-ruminant fecal pollution in surface waters.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ufnar; Shiao Y Wang; David F Ufnar; R D Ellender
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Stephen Hill; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Anthony C Yannarell; Shreya Ghosh; George Di Giovanni; Roderick I Mackie; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Estimation of pig fecal contamination in a river catchment by real-time PCR using two pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.

Authors:  Sophie Mieszkin; Jean-Pierre Furet; Gérard Corthier; Michèle Gourmelon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Pig manure contamination marker selection based on the influence of biological treatment on the dominant fecal microbial groups.

Authors:  Romain Marti; Patrick Dabert; Anne-Marie Pourcher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of Lactobacillus sobrius/L. amylovorus as a new microbial marker of pig manure.

Authors:  Romain Marti; Patrick Dabert; Christine Ziebal; Anne-Marie Pourcher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Shreya Ghosh; John Martinson; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.