Literature DB >> 25600418

Source tracking swine fecal waste in surface water proximal to swine concentrated animal feeding operations.

Christopher D Heaney1, Kevin Myers2, Steve Wing3, Devon Hall4, Dothula Baron4, Jill R Stewart2.   

Abstract

Swine farming has gone through many changes in the last few decades, resulting in operations with a high animal density known as confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). These operations produce a large quantity of fecal waste whose environmental impacts are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate microbial water quality in surface waters proximal to swine CAFOs including microbial source tracking of fecal microbes specific to swine. For one year, surface water samples at up- and downstream sites proximal to swine CAFO lagoon waste land application sites were tested for fecal indicator bacteria (fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus) and candidate swine-specific microbial source-tracking (MST) markers (Bacteroidales Pig-1-Bac, Pig-2-Bac, and Pig-Bac-2, and methanogen P23-2). Testing of 187 samples showed high fecal indicator bacteria concentrations at both up- and downstream sites. Overall, 40%, 23%, and 61% of samples exceeded state and federal recreational water quality guidelines for fecal coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus, respectively. Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac showed the highest specificity to swine fecal wastes and were 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03, 5.94) and 2.30 times (95% CI=0.90, 5.88) as prevalent proximal down- than proximal upstream of swine CAFOs, respectively. Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac were also 2.87 (95% CI=1.21, 6.80) and 3.36 (95% CI=1.34, 8.41) times as prevalent when 48 hour antecedent rainfall was greater than versus less than the mean, respectively. Results suggest diffuse and overall poor sanitary quality of surface waters where swine CAFO density is high. Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac are useful for tracking off-site conveyance of swine fecal wastes into surface waters proximal to and downstream of swine CAFOs and during rain events.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concentrated animal feeding operation; E. coli; Enterococcus; Fecal pollution; Microbial source tracking; Run-off; Swine; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600418      PMCID: PMC4514616          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  22 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal variability of fecal indicator bacteria in an urban stream under different meteorological regimes.

Authors:  Sung Min Cha; Seung Won Lee; Yong Eun Park; Kyung Hwa Cho; Seungyoon Lee; Joon Ha Kim
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods.

Authors:  Jill R Stewart; Alexandria B Boehm; Eric A Dubinsky; Theng-Theng Fong; Kelly D Goodwin; John F Griffith; Rachel T Noble; Orin C Shanks; Kannappan Vijayavel; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Fecal bacteroidales diversity and decay in response to variations in temperature and salinity.

Authors:  Christopher J Schulz; Gary W Childers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of EPA collaborative problem-solving model to obtain environmental justice in North Carolina.

Authors:  Sacoby M Wilson; Omega R Wilson; Christopher D Heaney; John Cooper
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2007

5.  Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; John F Griffith; Patricia A Holden; Jenny A Jay; Orin C Shanks; Dan Wang; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Effect of oxygen and temperature on the dynamic of the dominant bacterial populations of pig manure and on the persistence of pig-associated genetic markers, assessed in river water microcosms.

Authors:  R Marti; S Mieszkin; O Solecki; A-M Pourcher; D Hervio-Heath; M Gourmelon
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) levels during dry weather from Southern California reference streams.

Authors:  Liesl L Tiefenthaler; Eric D Stein; Greg S Lyon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Anthony C Yannarell; Shreya Ghosh; George Di Giovanni; Roderick I Mackie; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Long-term monitoring of waterborne pathogens and microbial source tracking markers in paired agricultural watersheds under controlled and conventional tile drainage management.

Authors:  Graham Wilkes; Julie Brassard; Thomas A Edge; Victor Gannon; Natalie Gottschall; Cassandra C Jokinen; Tineke H Jones; Izhar U H Khan; Romain Marti; Mark D Sunohara; Edward Topp; David R Lapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Coherence among different microbial source tracking markers in a small agricultural stream with or without livestock exclusion practices.

Authors:  Graham Wilkes; Julie Brassard; Thomas A Edge; Victor Gannon; Cassandra C Jokinen; Tineke H Jones; Romain Marti; Norman F Neumann; Norma J Ruecker; Mark Sunohara; Edward Topp; David R Lapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Microbial Source Tracking in Adjacent Karst Springs.

Authors:  Shoshanit Ohad; Dalit Vaizel-Ohayon; Meir Rom; Joseph Guttman; Diego Berger; Valeria Kravitz; Shlomo Pilo; Zohar Huberman; Yechezkel Kashi; Efrat Rorman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Exposure to industrial hog operations and gastrointestinal illness in North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Arbor J L Quist; David A Holcomb; Mike Dolan Fliss; Paul L Delamater; David B Richardson; Lawrence S Engel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 10.753

3.  "Ag-Gag" Laws: Evolution, Resurgence, and Public Health Implications.

Authors:  Caitlin A Ceryes; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 4.  Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry.

Authors:  Jill Johnston; Lara Cushing
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2020-03

5.  Pig-2-Bac as a biomarker of occupational exposure to pigs and livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus among industrial hog operation workers.

Authors:  Nora Pisanic; Maya Nadimpalli; Jessica L Rinsky; Jill Stewart; Steve Wing; David C Love; Devon Hall; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Distribution of environmental justice metrics for exposure to CAFOs in North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Ji-Young Son; Rebecca L Muenich; Danica Schaffer-Smith; Marie Lynn Miranda; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Analysis of migration of pathogenic drug-resistant bacteria to soils and groundwater after fertilization with sewage sludge.

Authors:  Ewa Stańczyk-Mazanek; Longina Stępniak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exposure to concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and risk of mortality in North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Ji-Young Son; Marie Lynn Miranda; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.