Literature DB >> 16329909

Characterisation of the microbial diversity in a pig manure storage pit using small subunit rDNA sequence analysis.

Raúl Snell-Castro1, Jean-Jacques Godon, Jean-Philippe Delgenès, Patrick Dabert.   

Abstract

The microbial community structure of pig manure slurry (PMS) was determined with comparative analysis of 202 bacterial, 44 archaeal and 33 eukaryotic small subunit (SSU) rDNA partial sequences. Based on a criterion of 97% of sequence similarity, the phylogenetic analyses revealed a total of 108, eight and five phylotypes for the Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya lineages, respectively. Only 36% of the bacterial phylotypes were closely related (>or=97% similarity) to any previously known sequence in databases. The bacterial groups most often represented in terms of phylotype and clone abundance were the Eubacterium (22% of total sequences), the Clostridium (15% of sequences), the Bacillus-Lactobacillus-Streptococcus subdivision (20% of sequences), theMycoplasma and relatives (10% of sequences) and the Flexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides (20% of sequences). The global microbial community structure and phylotype diversity show a close relationship to the pig gastrointestinal tract ecosystem whereas phylotypes from the Acholeplasma-Anaeroplasma and the Clostridium purinolyticum groups appear to be better represented in manure. Archaeal diversity was dominated by three phylotypes clustering with a group of uncultured microorganisms of unknown activity and only distantly related to the Thermoplasmales and relatives. Other Archaea were methanogenic H2/CO2 utilisers. No known acetoclastic Archaea methanogen was found. Eukaryotic diversity was represented by a pluricellular nematode, two Alveolata, a Blastocystis and an Entamoebidae. Manure slurry physico-chemical characteristics were analysed. Possible inhibitory effects of acetate, sulphide and ammonia concentrations on the microbial anaerobic ecosystem are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16329909     DOI: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  37 in total

1.  Development and application of an enzymatic and cell flotation treatment for the recovery of viable microbial cells from environmental matrices such as anaerobic sludge.

Authors:  Florence Braun; Jérôme Hamelin; Gaëlle Gévaudan; Dominique Patureau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Dynamics of a pig slurry microbial community during anaerobic storage and management.

Authors:  Pascal Peu; Hubert Brugère; Anne-Marie Pourcher; Monique Kérourédan; Jean-Jacques Godon; Jean-Philippe Delgenès; Patrick Dabert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial diversity in hypersaline wastewater: the example of tanneries.

Authors:  O Lefebvre; N Vasudevan; K Thanasekaran; R Moletta; J J Godon
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Clare H Auckland; Denis H Lynn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Worldwide prevalence of class 2 integrases outside the clinical setting is associated with human impact.

Authors:  Carlos M Rodríguez-Minguela; Juha H A Apajalahti; Benli Chai; James R Cole; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Fate of chlortetracycline- and tylosin-resistant bacteria in an aerobic thermophilic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste.

Authors:  Martin R Chénier; Pierre Juteau
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Evaluation of an integrated constructed wetland to manage pig manure under Mediterranean climate.

Authors:  Julie Nehmtow; Jacques Rabier; Raphaël Giguel; Bruno Coulomb; Anne Marie Farnet; Claude Perissol; Arnaud Alary; Isabelle Laffont-Schwob
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene based phylogenetic analysis of methanogens population in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis).

Authors:  Prem Prashant Chaudhary; Sunil Kumar Sirohi; Dheer Singh; Jyoti Saxena
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Culture-independent characterization of archaeal biodiversity in swine confinement building bioaerosols.

Authors:  Benjamin Nehmé; Yan Gilbert; Valérie Létourneau; Robert J Forster; Marc Veillette; Richard Villemur; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Xuanli Ma; Nestor E Obispo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.