Literature DB >> 19525269

Pig manure contamination marker selection based on the influence of biological treatment on the dominant fecal microbial groups.

Romain Marti1, Patrick Dabert, Anne-Marie Pourcher.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify a microbial marker for pig manure contamination. We quantified the persistence of four dominant bacterial groups from the pig intestinal tract throughout manure handling at 10 livestock operations (including aerobic digestion) by using molecular typing. The partial 16S rRNA genes of Bacteroides-Prevotella, Eubacterium-Clostridiaceae, Bacillus-Streptococcus-Lactobacillus (BSL), and Bifidobacterium group isolates were amplified and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformation polymorphism. The most dominant bacterial populations were identified by cloning and sequencing their 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that Bifidobacterium spp. and, to a lesser extent, members of the BSL group, were less affected by the aerobic treatment than either Eubacterium-Clostridiaceae or Bacteroides-Prevotella. Two Bifidobacterium species found in raw manure were still present in manure during land application, suggesting that they can survive outside the pig intestinal tract and also survive aerobic treatment. The 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer of one species, Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum, was sequenced, and a specific pair of primers was designed for its detection in the environment. With this nested PCR assay, this potential marker was not detected in samples from 30 bovine, 30 poultry, and 28 human fecal samples or in 15 urban wastewater effluents. As it was detected in runoff waters after spreading of pig manure, we propose this marker as a suitable microbial indicator of pig manure contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525269      PMCID: PMC2725498          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02791-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  56 in total

1.  Bacterial and archaeal 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA dynamics during an acetate crisis in an anaerobic digestor ecosystem.

Authors:  C Delbès; R Moletta; J -J. Godon
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Monitoring of activity dynamics of an anaerobic digester bacterial community using 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction--single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis.

Authors:  C Delbès; R Moletta; J J Godon
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces.

Authors:  C Andrew Carson; Jessica M Christiansen; Helen Yampara-Iquise; Verel W Benson; Claire Baffaut; Jerri V Davis; Robert R Broz; William B Kurtz; Wendi M Rogers; William H Fales
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.

Authors:  Michèle Gourmelon; Marie Paule Caprais; Raphaël Ségura; Cécile Le Mennec; Solen Lozach; Jean Yves Piriou; Alain Rincé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Persistence of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers in environmental waters: effects of temperature and salinity.

Authors:  Satoshi Okabe; Yoko Shimazu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Single strand conformational polymorphism using capillary electrophoresis with two-dye laser-induced fluorescence detection.

Authors:  K Hebenbrock; P M Williams; B L Karger
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Analysis of bifidobacterial evolution using a multilocus approach.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; Carlos Canchaya; Antonio Del Casale; Franco Dellaglio; Erasmo Neviani; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  A novel galactooligosaccharide mixture increases the bifidobacterial population numbers in a continuous in vitro fermentation system and in the proximal colonic contents of pigs in vivo.

Authors:  George Tzortzis; Athanasios K Goulas; Jennifer M Gee; Glenn R Gibson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L A Khatib; Y L Tsai; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Classification of a moderately oxygen-tolerant isolate from baby faeces as Bifidobacterium thermophilum.

Authors:  Ueli von Ah; Valeria Mozzetti; Christophe Lacroix; Ehab E Kheadr; Ismaïl Fliss; Leo Meile
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  8 in total

1.  Persistence of resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline in swine manure during simulated composting and lagoon treatments.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Yukiko Oda; Sukhbir Grewal; Mark Morrison; Frederick C Michel; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Bifidobacterial diversity and the development of new microbial source tracking indicators.

Authors:  Elisenda Ballesté; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Discovering new indicators of fecal pollution.

Authors:  Sandra L McLellan; A Murat Eren
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Evaluation of Lactobacillus sobrius/L. amylovorus as a new microbial marker of pig manure.

Authors:  Romain Marti; Patrick Dabert; Christine Ziebal; Anne-Marie Pourcher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Fate and Survival of Campylobacter coli in Swine Manure at Various Temperatures.

Authors:  Xuan Thanh Bui; Anders Wolff; Mogen Madsen; Dang Duong Bang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Comparison of DNA extraction kits and modification of DNA elution procedure for the quantitation of subdominant bacteria from piggery effluents with real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jérémy Desneux; Anne-Marie Pourcher
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Genomic Characteristics of Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum Pig Isolates and Wild Boar Isolates Reveal the Unique Presence of a Putative Mobile Genetic Element with tetW for Pig Farm Isolates.

Authors:  Sayaka Tsuchida; Fumito Maruyama; Yoshitoshi Ogura; Atsushi Toyoda; Tetsuya Hayashi; Moriya Okuma; Kazunari Ushida
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Comparison of microbial communities in swine manure at various temperatures and storage times.

Authors:  Joung-Soo Lim; Seung Hak Yang; Bong-Soo Kim; Eun Young Lee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.509

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.