Literature DB >> 2757376

Enumeration of selected anaerobic bacterial groups in cecal and colonic contents of growing-finishing pigs.

T J Butine1, J A Leedle.   

Abstract

Selected anaerobic bacterial groups in cecal and colonic contents of clinically healthy pigs fed a corn-soybean meal production diet were determined at sacrifice after 4, 8, and 11 weeks on feed, corresponding to intervals within the growing-finishing growth period. By using ruminal fluid-based media, the densities of the culturable anaerobic population; the cellulolytic, pectin-fermenting, pectin-hydrolyzing, xylan-fermenting; and the xylan-hydrolyzing, sulfate-reducing, and methanogenic bacterial populations were estimated. An analysis of variance was performed on these bacterial group variables to examine the effects of phase (weeks on feed), site (cecum or colon), or the interaction of phase with site. The population of total anaerobic bacteria was twice as dense in the colon as it was in the cecum (2 x 10(10) versus 1 x 10(10)/g [wet weight]; P = 0.001). The proportion of cellulolytic bacteria was lower at 4 weeks on feed than at 8 or 11 weeks (23 versus 32%; P = 0.026), while the proportion of pectin-fermenting bacteria depended on the interaction of phase with site (P = 0.021). The numbers of sulfate-reducing bacteria were significantly higher in the colon than in the cecum (6 x 10(7) versus 3 x 10(7); P = 0.014), as were methanogenic bacteria (19 x 10(7) versus 0.6 x 10(7); P = 0.0002). The remaining bacterial groups were stable with respect to phase and site. The results suggest that except for density differences, the microbial communities of the pig cecum and colon are similar in composition throughout the growing-finishing phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2757376      PMCID: PMC184262          DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.5.1112-1116.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Effect of high-fiber and high-oil diets on the fecal flora of swine.

Authors:  W E Moore; L V Moore; E P Cato; T D Wilkins; E T Kornegay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Types and distribution of anaerobic bacteria in the large intestine of pigs.

Authors:  E G Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group.

Authors:  W E Balch; G E Fox; L J Magrum; C R Woese; R S Wolfe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1979-06

4.  Characterization of the cecal bacteria of normal pigs.

Authors:  I M Robinson; M J Allison; J A Bucklin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sulfate-reducing anaerobic bacteria in human feces.

Authors:  H Beerens; C Romond
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Enumeration and activity of cellulolytic bacteria from gestating swine fed various levels of dietary fiber.

Authors:  V H Varel; W G Pond
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Some nutritional characteristics of predominant culturable ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  M P BRYANT; I M ROBINSON
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Characterization of predominant bacteria from the colons of normal and dysenteric pigs.

Authors:  I M Robinson; S C Whipp; J A Bucklin; M J Allison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations.

Authors:  J A Leedle; R B Hespell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Degradation of pig gastric and colonic mucins by bacteria isolated from the pig colon.

Authors:  R A Stanley; S P Ram; R K Wilkinson; A M Roberton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  12 in total

1.  Identification and quantification of methanogenic Archaea in adult chicken ceca.

Authors:  Suwat Saengkerdsub; Robin C Anderson; Heather H Wilkinson; Woo-Kyun Kim; David J Nisbet; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Hydrogen sulphide: a bacterial toxin in ulcerative colitis?

Authors:  M C Pitcher; J H Cummings
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Molecular ecological analysis of the succession and diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the mouse gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  B Deplancke; K R Hristova; H A Oakley; V J McCracken; R Aminov; R I Mackie; H R Gaskins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Changes in bacterial community structure in the colon of pigs fed different experimental diets and after infection with Brachyspira hyodysenteriae.

Authors:  T D Leser; R H Lindecrona; T K Jensen; B B Jensen; K Møller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  In vitro total-gas, CH4, H2, volatile fatty acid, and lactate kinetics studies on luminal contents from the small intestine, cecum, and colon of the pig.

Authors:  J A Robinson; W J Smolenski; M L Ogilvie; J P Peters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of ileum microflora of pigs fed corn-, wheat-, or barley-based diets by chaperonin-60 sequencing and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Janet E Hill; Sean M Hemmingsen; Blair G Goldade; Tim J Dumonceaux; Jonathan Klassen; Ruurd T Zijlstra; Swee Han Goh; Andrew G Van Kessel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Methanogenesis in monogastric animals.

Authors:  B B Jensen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Anthony C Yannarell; Shreya Ghosh; George Di Giovanni; Roderick I Mackie; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Prokaryotes: the unseen majority.

Authors:  W B Whitman; D C Coleman; W J Wiebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ufnar; David F Ufnar; Shiao Y Wang; R D Ellender
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.