Literature DB >> 17578673

Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

Ken Yamaura1, Kazuo Irita, Tadashi Kandabashi, Kohei Tohyama, Shosuke Takahashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion.
METHODS: About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF.
RESULTS: PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17578673     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  20 in total

1.  Designing a pulse oximeter safety standard.

Authors:  Sandy Weininger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Evaluation of oesophageal pulse oximetry in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  P A Kyriacou; S L Powell; D P Jones; R M Langford
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Forehead is as sensitive as finger pulse oximetry during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Shigekazu Sugino; Noriaki Kanaya; Masahito Mizuuchi; Masayasu Nakayama; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Forehead SpO2 monitoring compared to finger SpO2 recording in emergency transport.

Authors:  M Nuhr; K Hoerauf; A Joldzo; N Frickey; R Barker; L Gorove; T Puskas; A Kober
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Clinical evaluation of a prototype motion artifact resistant pulse oximeter in the recovery room.

Authors:  C Dumas; J A Wahr; K K Tremper
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  The effect of venous pulsation on the forehead pulse oximeter wave form as a possible source of error in Spo2 calculation.

Authors:  Kirk H Shelley; Doris Tamai; Denis Jablonka; Michael Gesquiere; Robert G Stout; David G Silverman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The effects of motion on the performance of pulse oximeters in volunteers (revised publication).

Authors:  S J Barker; N K Shah
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Effect of peripheral perfusion on accuracy of pulse oximetry in children.

Authors:  R Villanueva; C Bell; Z N Kain; K A Colingo
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  The desaturation response time of finger pulse oximeters during mild hypothermia.

Authors:  D B MacLeod; L I Cortinez; J C Keifer; D Cameron; D R Wright; W D White; E W Moretti; L R Radulescu; J Somma
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Buccal pulse oximeter is more accurate than finger pulse oximeter in measuring oxygen saturation.

Authors:  R J O'Leary; M Landon; J L Benumof
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Fabio Cavallaro; Cristina Marano; Chiara Falcone; Paolo De Santis; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haitao Chu; Yong Wang; Yanfei Sun; Gang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Accuracy of pleth variability index compared with inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Özcan Pişkin; İbrahim İlker Öz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.