Literature DB >> 26242233

Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haitao Chu1, Yong Wang1, Yanfei Sun1, Gang Wang2.   

Abstract

To systemically evaluate the accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A literature search of PUBMED, OVID, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data for clinical studies in which the accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness was performed (last update 5 April 2015). Related journals were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality according to the modified QUADAS items. Heterogeneous studies and meta-analysis were conducted by Meta-Disc 1.4 software. A subgroup analysis in the operating room (OR) and in intensive care unit (ICU) was also performed. Differences between subgroups were analyzed using the interaction test. A total of 18 studies involving 665 subjects were included. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients was 0.88 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.91]. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95 % CI 0.68-0.78) and 0.82 (95 % CI 0.77-0.86), respectively. No heterogeneity was found within studies nor between studies. And there was no significant heterogeneity within each subgroup. No statistical differences were found between OR subgroup and ICU subgroup in the AUC [0.89 (95 % CI 0.85-0.92) versus 0.90 (95 % CI 0.82-0.94); P = 0.97], and in the specificity [0.84 (95 % CI 0.75-0.86) vs. 0.84 (95 % CI 0.75-0.91); P = 1.00]. Sensitivity was higher in the OR subgroup than the ICU subgroup [0.84 (95 % CI 0.78-0.88) vs. 0.56 (95 % CI 0.47-0.64); P = 0.00004]. The pleth variability index has a reasonable ability to predict fluid responsiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Fluid responsiveness; Meta-analysis; Pleth variability index; Sensitivity; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26242233     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9742-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  43 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion.

Authors:  Alexandre Lima; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.

Authors:  M Cannesson; O Desebbe; P Rosamel; B Delannoy; J Robin; O Bastien; J-J Lehot
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Accuracy of noninvasive haemoglobin measurement by pulse oximetry depends on the type of infusion fluid.

Authors:  Christian Bergek; Joachim H Zdolsek; Robert G Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Accuracy of pulse oximeter perfusion index in thoracic epidural anesthesia under basal general anesthesia.

Authors:  Zifeng Xu; Jianhai Zhang; Yunfei Xia; Xiaoming Deng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery.

Authors:  L Ø Høiseth; I E Hoff; O A Hagen; S A Landsverk; K A Kirkebøen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Pulse pressure vs. total arterial compliance as a marker of arterial health.

Authors:  B A Haluska; L Jeffriess; R B Fathi; P M Mottram; S G Carlier; T H Marwick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 8.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Ken Yamaura; Kazuo Irita; Tadashi Kandabashi; Kohei Tohyama; Shosuke Takahashi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 1.977

10.  Impact of norepinephrine on the relationship between pleth variability index and pulse pressure variations in ICU adult patients.

Authors:  Matthieu Biais; Vincent Cottenceau; Laurent Petit; Françoise Masson; Jean-François Cochard; François Sztark
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Jan Bakker; Maurizio Cecconi; Ludhmila Hajjar; Da Wei Liu; Suzanna Lobo; Xavier Monnet; Andrea Morelli; Sheila Neinan Myatra; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul E Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed H Elwan; Ashraf Roshdy; Eman M Elsharkawy; Salah M Eltahan; Timothy J Coats
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Reliability of pleth variability index in predicting preload responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianyu Liu; Chao Xu; Min Wang; Zheng Niu; Dunyi Qi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation-an experts' opinion paper.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Emmanuel Futier; Camille Vaisse; Olivier Collange; Olivier Huet; Jerôme Loriau; Etienne Gayat; Benoit Tavernier; Matthieu Biais; Karim Asehnoune; Bernard Cholley; Dan Longrois
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Accuracy of pleth variability index compared with inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Özcan Pişkin; İbrahim İlker Öz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Effect of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (Delta PP and PVI) during Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Djamal Ghoundiwal; Amelie Delaporte; Javad Bidgoli; Patrice Forget; Jean-François Fils; Philippe Van der Linden
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.