Literature DB >> 17569012

Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.

Jin-Cheol Kim1, Yong-Keun Lee, Bum-Soon Lim, Sang-Hoon Rhee, Hyeong-Cheol Yang.   

Abstract

Sutures are classified into non-absorbable and absorbable, and mechanical properties of these materials vary by the composition. Knotting induces decrease in mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile and knot security properties depending on the type and caliber of sutures. Changes in properties after tensile loading were measured with absorbable sutures. Tensile properties such as maximum tensile load, elongation rate, stiffness and energy absorbed before breakage of seven kinds of surgical sutures were measured. Absorbable sutures were immersed in 37 degrees C Hank's balanced salt solution up to 14 days under the tensile load of 100 g/thread, and properties were measured again. Knot was formed with surgeon's knot method, and tensile properties were measured. Five specimens were tested for each condition. Values were analyzed with one- or two-way analysis of variance (alpha = 0.05). Maximum tensile load of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 10.0 N to 14.3 N. In non-absorbable sutures, the type of suture material influenced the tensile properties (P < 0.05). In absorbable sutures, the maximum tensile load after tensile loading decreased, which was significant in chromic catgut (CC). Knot security of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 8.7 N to 11.9 N. Type of non-absorbable suture influenced knot security (P < 0.05), and the synthetic monofilament materials showed a tendency to be untied easily. Since no single suture material possesses all of the requirements, proper type and caliber suture should be selected based on this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17569012     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

1.  The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical sliding knots.

Authors:  Joseph J Ivy; James B Unger; Jason Hurt; Debi Mukherjee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous polyglyconate monofilament absorbable suture.

Authors:  D G Gallup; T E Nolan; R P Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Biodegradation of absorbable sutures in body fluids and pH buffers.

Authors:  S Freudenberg; S Rewerk; M Kaess; Christel Weiss; A Dorn-Beinecke; S Post
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 4.  Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery.

Authors:  R L Moy; A Lee; A Zalka
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa.

Authors:  R J Shaw; T W Negus; T K Mellor
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Experimental evaluation of microsurgical techniques in small artery anastomoses.

Authors:  J R Urbaniak; P N Soucacos; R S Adelaar; D S Bright; L A Whitehurst
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Handling characteristics of poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) monofilament suture.

Authors:  Kenji Tomihata; Masakazu Suzuki; Naohide Tomita
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.300

8.  A review of absorbable suture materials in head & neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture.

Authors:  J LaBagnara
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.697

9.  A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Tom M Lawrence; Tim R C Davis
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Fascicular nerve suture.

Authors:  J R Urbaniak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  23 in total

1.  Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Jörg Höer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Rachel M Clark
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  Comparison between tensile characteristics of various suture materials with two suture techniques: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Aysegul Erten Taysi; Pinar Ercal; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The use of barbed sutures in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Barbed Sutures and Tendon Repair-a Review.

Authors:  Ajul Shah; Megan Rowlands; Alexander Au
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

6.  Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Miroslav Dragovic; Marko Pejovic; Jelena Stepic; Snjezana Colic; Branko Dozic; Svetlana Dragovic; Milos Lazarevic; Nadja Nikolic; Jelena Milasin; Biljana Milicic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A new adaptation for a secure surgical drain placement and a comparison with four common drain fixation methods.

Authors:  L Heskin; V Cahill; G Filobbos; P Regan; S T O'Sullivan; K Bryan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A combined approach for the development of novel sutures with antibacterial and regenerative properties: the role of silver and silk sericin functionalization.

Authors:  Anna Lucia Gallo; Mauro Pollini; Federica Paladini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Omeed Paydar; Anna Tao; Megan LaRocca; Kang Liu; Bradley Genovese; Robert Candler; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clamp fixation to prevent unfolding of a suture knot decreases tensile strength of polypropylene sutures.

Authors:  Mehmet Türker; Mehmet Yalçinozan; Meriç Çirpar; Özgür Çetik; Barış Kalaycioğlu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.