Literature DB >> 30328703

A new adaptation for a secure surgical drain placement and a comparison with four common drain fixation methods.

L Heskin1, V Cahill1, G Filobbos2, P Regan3, S T O'Sullivan1, K Bryan4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The importance of postoperative drain fixation cannot be overemphasised. There are numerous described techniques for drain fixation. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence-based comparison between the various techniques of drain fixation used in postoperative management. We describe a new method and compare its reliability with four other commonly used methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five methods were chosen for testing based on current trends in clinical practice: centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal or lattice method, centurion sandal with half-inch Steristrips®, double and multiple looped methods. We used an Instron 8872® tensiometer to apply a measured force to a secured drain. Each fixation method was tested ten times and all fixation methods were performed by the same experienced surgeon. We measured the average number of cycles before failure, the average displacement of the tube at failure and the time needed to apply each fixation method.
RESULTS: The number of cycles completed before failure showed that the centurion sandal method, the centurion sandal with plastic ties and the centurion sandal method with Steristrips had the lowest failure rate. The amount of displacement was the least in the centurion sandal with plastic ties followed by the double-loop method and centurion sandal with Steristrips. There was little difference in the time taken to complete the fixation methods (range 21-33 seconds). DISCUSSION: We recommend the use of the centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal with Steristrips followed by the centurion sandal method alone as fixation techniques that are quick to perform, secure and reliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Displacement; Drain fixation; Drain reliability; Drain, securement; Surgical drain

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30328703      PMCID: PMC6303816          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  29 in total

1.  Effective securing of a drain.

Authors:  P O'Flynn; S Akhtar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  An alternative method for securing surgical drains in the neck.

Authors:  P V Lim; M A Jalaludin
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2000-03

3.  Drain fixation made foolproof.

Authors:  E Hormbrey; A Pandya; D Humzah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  A non-sutured method of drain fixation.

Authors:  M J Forshaw; J M F Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  An alternative method for securing suction drains.

Authors:  D T Falconer
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  A new head and neck surgical drain fixation technique.

Authors:  Mingyann Lim; Lisa Pitkin; Paul Spraggs
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Securing drains: the clinch knot.

Authors:  W A Townley; O J H Harley
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2005-07

8.  A simple method for securing a surgical drain.

Authors:  Kayvan Shokrollahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Further information on a simple method for securing a surgical drain.

Authors:  H Carter; I Milliken; M R Powis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  A simple way of securing drains.

Authors:  L A Clark; M H Clark; D R Ball
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 1.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.