Joseph J Ivy1, James B Unger, Jason Hurt, Debi Mukherjee. 1. Division of Gynecologic Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to test the integrity of nonidentical sliding knots made with 3 throws compared with those made with 6 throws with monofilament and braided absorbable suture. STUDY DESIGN: The 3 throw nonidentical sliding knot was compared with the 6 throw nonidentical sliding knot in 4 different suture groups. The groups were 0-0 polydioxanone, 2-0 polydioxanone, 0-0 polyglactin 910, and 2-0 polyglactin 910. Knots were tested to failure with a tensiometer. The proportion of 3 throw knots becoming untied was compared with the 6 throw knot within each group. Ultimate load required to break tied knots within each suture group was also evaluated. RESULTS: The 3 throw knots had very high rates of knot failure and untied significantly more often than the 6 throw knots. CONCLUSION: The 6 throw nonidentical sliding knot demonstrates superior knot integrity compared with the 3 throw knot with both monofilament and braided absorbable suture.
OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to test the integrity of nonidentical sliding knots made with 3 throws compared with those made with 6 throws with monofilament and braided absorbable suture. STUDY DESIGN: The 3 throw nonidentical sliding knot was compared with the 6 throw nonidentical sliding knot in 4 different suture groups. The groups were 0-0 polydioxanone, 2-0 polydioxanone, 0-0 polyglactin 910, and 2-0 polyglactin 910. Knots were tested to failure with a tensiometer. The proportion of 3 throw knots becoming untied was compared with the 6 throw knot within each group. Ultimate load required to break tied knots within each suture group was also evaluated. RESULTS: The 3 throw knots had very high rates of knot failure and untied significantly more often than the 6 throw knots. CONCLUSION: The 6 throw nonidentical sliding knot demonstrates superior knot integrity compared with the 3 throw knot with both monofilament and braided absorbable suture.
Authors: Chunfeng Zhao; Chung-Chen Hsu; Tamami Moriya; Andrew R Thoreson; Steven S Cha; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Lars Fischer; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Jörg Höer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Stefan Neuhofer; Karl Wieser; Georg Lajtai; Daniel Müller; Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 4.342