Literature DB >> 31342245

Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.

Miroslav Dragovic1, Marko Pejovic1, Jelena Stepic1, Snjezana Colic1, Branko Dozic2, Svetlana Dragovic3, Milos Lazarevic4, Nadja Nikolic4, Jelena Milasin4, Biljana Milicic5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sutures are the most frequently used medical device for wound closure. They support tissue during the early phase of healing until it regains enough tensile strength. The aim of this study was to compare four different suture materials in terms of the influence on wound healing, microbial adherence, tissue reaction, and relevant clinical parameters which determine their clinical value.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total number of 32 patients undergoing surgical extraction of four impacted third molars were involved in the study. Clinical parameters were estimated intraoperatively and during the control check-ups. Soft tissue healing around sutures were evaluated on the 3rd and 7th day postoperatively. Microbial colonization was assessed by means of qPCR. Also, histological analysis was done to assess inflammatory reaction.
RESULTS: Significantly better soft tissue healing was found around monofilament and synthetic sutures compared to multifilament and natural ones respectively. Soft tissue healing was significantly better around all sutures on the 7th day than on the 3rd day postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-resorbable polypropylene suture showed superior clinical characteristics among all sutures. Moreover, the best healing of soft tissue and the least inflammatory reaction was found around this thread. The poorest soft tissue healing was found around non-resorbable silk suture. This suture elicited strongest inflammatory reaction and showed the greatest microbial adherence affinity compared to alternative sutures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Monofilament synthetic suture should be used in order to obtain the best soft tissue healing, reduce the risk of postoperative infection, and alleviate the suturing after oral surgery procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inflammatory reactions; Microbial adherence; Monofilament; Oral surgery; Soft tissue healing; Sutures

Year:  2019        PMID: 31342245     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  32 in total

1.  A comparative study between two different suture materials in oral implantology.

Authors:  Olivia Pons-Vicente; Lidia López-Jiménez; María Angels Sánchez-Garcés; Sergi Sala-Pérez; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration.

Authors:  Giuseppe Polimeni; Andreas V Xiropaidis; Ulf M E Wikesjö
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.589

3.  Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.

Authors:  Jin-Cheol Kim; Yong-Keun Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Sang-Hoon Rhee; Hyeong-Cheol Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Suture choice and other methods of skin closure.

Authors:  Julio Hochberg; Kathleen M Meyer; Michael D Marion
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Delayed onset infections after lower third molar germectomy could be related to the space distal to the second molar.

Authors:  G Monaco; S Cecchini; M R Gatto; G A Pelliccioni
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  An analysis of suture withdrawal stress.

Authors:  B S Freeman; C A Homsy; J Fissette; S B Hardy
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1970-09

8.  Suture resistance to infection.

Authors:  W V Sharp; T A Belden; P H King; P C Teague
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Adherence of bacteria to suture materials.

Authors:  B Sugarman; D Musher
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1981-06

10.  Rate of loss of irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide) from the mouth: a prospective study.

Authors:  L K McCaul; J Bagg; W M Jenkins
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.651

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesive for intraoral wound closure.

Authors:  Philipp Becker; Adrian Kasaj; Sven Schumann; Peer W Kämmerer; Daniel G E Thiem; Diana Heimes; Andreas Pabst
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.