Literature DB >> 33851242

Comparison between tensile characteristics of various suture materials with two suture techniques: an in vitro study.

Aysegul Erten Taysi1, Pinar Ercal2, Soner Sismanoglu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The first objective of the present study was to evaluate the tensile strength and elongation to failure of commonly used suture materials in oral surgery. As a secondary objective, it was aimed to make a comparison between two different suture techniques within the same suture materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight different suture materials with 3-0 gauge (silk, polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, polyester, polyglactin 910, polyglycolic acid, poliglecaprone 25, polydioxanone) underwent tensile testing for maximum load of failure and elongation rate. All strands were tied by one investigator on the experimental platform using the surgeon's knot plus additional square knots in both simple suture and horizontal mattress suture techniques. Prepared specimens were examined using a microtensile testing device before (baseline) and after 3, 7, and 14 days' immersion in artificial saliva.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the current study revealed that the tensile strength for polyglycolic acid, polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and silk sutures was significantly lower at day 3 than at the baseline. By day 14, polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 showed a significant reduction in tensile strength for both techniques. While polydioxanone obtained the highest tensile strength and elongation values in both techniques, polytetrafluoroethylene showed the most stable tensile strength even with the lowest value. Tensile strength in simple suture techniques was almost twice than that of horizontal mattress suture technique for each specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 were considerably sensitive to immersion time. Polydioxanone demonstrated optimum performance during each immersion period among the tested materials, whereas polytetrafluoroethylene was the most stable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The selection of the most proper suture material remains challenging for clinicians. The present study provides relevant information for clinicians to guide them in their choice of the suitable material. In this context, clinicians can benefit from the use of polydioxanone for its high tensile strength regardless of the suture technique used, whereas polytetrafluoroethylene shows a long-term stability. The strength and stability differences among suture materials and techniques need to be considered before making an informed decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial saliva; Materials testing; Suture techniques; Sutures; Wound healings

Year:  2021        PMID: 33851242     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03943-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

1.  Oral tissue reactions to suture materials.

Authors:  K A Selvig; G R Biagiotti; K N Leknes; U M Wikesjö
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tissue reactions to suture materials in the oral mucosa of beagle dogs.

Authors:  Jae-Seok Kim; Seung-Il Shin; Yeek Herr; Joon-Bong Park; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 3.  The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; T Bailey; V Smrkolj
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  In Vitro Tensile Strength Study on Suturing Technique and Material.

Authors:  Albert González-Barnadas; Octavi Camps-Font; Dunia Espanya-Grifoll; Antoni España-Tost; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Neil McPherson; Alexander Grant
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study.

Authors:  Asvin Vasanthan; Keerthana Satheesh; Wyeth Hoopes; Patrick Lucaci; Karen Williams; John Rapley
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Mansour Al-Askar; Khalid Almas; Georgios E Romanos; Khalid Al-Hezaimi
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-05-08

8.  Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical synthetic absorbable suture materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Vinayak Khiste; V Ranganath; Ashish Sham Nichani
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  The Effect of Chlorhexidine and Listerine® Mouthwashes on the Tensile Strength of Selected Absorbable Sutures: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Alsarhan; Hourya Alnofaie; Rawan Ateeq; Ahmed Almahdy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  José Arce; Alondra Palacios; Daniel Alvítez-Temoche; G Mendoza-Azpur; Percy Romero-Tapia; Frank Mayta-Tovalino
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.