Literature DB >> 17348540

A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy.

Oleg A Sapozhnikov1, Adam D Maxwell, Brian MacConaghy, Michael R Bailey.   

Abstract

In vitro experiments and an elastic wave model were used to analyze how stress is induced in kidney stones by lithotripsy and to test the roles of individual mechanisms-spallation, squeezing, and cavitation. Cylindrical U30 cement stones were treated in an HM-3-style lithotripter. Baffles were used to block specific waves responsible for spallation or squeezing. Stones with and without surface cracks added to simulate cavitation damage were tested in glycerol (a cavitation suppressive medium). Each case was simulated using the elasticity equations for an isotropic medium. The calculated location of maximum stress compared well with the experimental observations of where stones fractured in two pieces. Higher calculated maximum tensile stress correlated with fewer shock waves required for fracture. The highest calculated tensile stresses resulted from shear waves initiated at the proximal corners and strengthened along the side surfaces of the stone by the liquid-borne lithotripter shock wave. Peak tensile stress was in the distal end of the stone where fracture occurred. Reflection of the longitudinal wave from the distal face of the stone--spallation-produced lower stresses. Surface cracks accelerated fragmentation when created near the location where the maximum stress was predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17348540     DOI: 10.1121/1.2404894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  Beamwidth measurement of individual lithotripter shock waves.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A heuristic model of stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Nathan B Smith; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Some Work on the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Stones with Ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Acoust Today       Date:  2017

9.  Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.