Literature DB >> 17563855

Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art.

A Stecco1, A Saponaro, A Carriero.   

Abstract

The presence of a static magnetic field (Bo), a radiofrequency field (RF), a dynamic gradient which varies in time and loud noises during an MR examination could increase patient risk. Specifically, a magnetic field could interfere with ferromagnetic material leading to one of the following five dangerous interactions: 1) projectile effect, 2) twisting, 3) burning, 4) artefacts and 5) device malfunction. The projectile effect is when an object is attracted by the magnet with the risk, as reported in literature, of hitting the patient, operators and/or the instrument. Objects which typically can undergo this effect are oxygen and helium cylinders, IV stands, cleaning trolleys, chairs, lamp holders, scissors, forceps, clampers, traction weights, monitoring instruments, and especially metallic splinters within the patient. Twisting (torsion) typically occurs with cerebral vascular clamps and cochlear implants. If parts of implants are involved a malfunction may result. Burns can be caused when electrically conductive material is introduced within the magnet, for example, ECG electrodes, monitoring cables and coils which are in contact with the patient's skin, as well as tattoos and eye-liners that contain iron-oxides. Artefacts can be induced by RF emission of implanted devices which can be mistaken for noise of the receiving coil. Implanted devices can induce signal voids which mask or simulate pathologies. Electrical or mechanical malfunction of implanted devices includes pacemakers which can stimulate inappropriately or at an elevated frequency yielding a distorted ECG with altered T-waves. The risk for patients can be reduced by specific educational programs within individual radiology departments which include other specializations and external referring physicians with the aim of developing a standardized safety protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563855     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0154-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   6.313


  72 in total

1.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Safety of MR scanning in patients with nonferromagnetic aneurysm clips.

Authors:  G L Pride; J Kowal; D B Mendelsohn; D P Chason; J L Fleckenstein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Fetal MR imaging.

Authors:  Nadine Gerard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Reconsideration of pacemakers and MR imaging.

Authors:  John Loewy; Amanda Loewy; Edward J Kendall
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Complementary role of MRI after sonography in assessing bilateral urinary tract anomalies in the fetus.

Authors:  Marie Cassart; Anne Massez; Thierry Metens; Françoise Rypens; M Alexandra Lambot; Michelle Hall; Fred E Avni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of normal and pathologic fetal brain.

Authors:  M Resta; N Burdi; N Medicamento
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C d'Ercole; N Girard; L Cravello; L Boubli; A Potier; C Raybaud; B Blanc
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Glover; J Hykin; P Gowland; J Wright; I Johnson; P Mansfield
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance.

Authors:  P N Baker; I R Johnson; P R Harvey; P A Gowland; P Mansfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Superficial- and deep-tissue temperature increases in anesthetized dogs during exposure to high specific absorption rates in a 1.5-T MR imager.

Authors:  W P Shuman; D R Haynor; A W Guy; G E Wesbey; D J Schaefer; A A Moss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  12 in total

1.  Was magnetic resonance imaging scan contraindicated?

Authors:  Muhammad Khizar Rafiq
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-03-23

2.  Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Meike Becker; Tobias Frauenrath; Fabian Hezel; Gabriele A Krombach; Ute Kremer; Benedikt Koppers; Christoph Butenweg; Andreas Goemmel; Jane F Utting; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Body MRI artefacts: from image degradation to diagnostic utility.

Authors:  G Rescinito; C Sirlin; G Cittadini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Jörn Kemper; Michael G Kaul; Markus Feddersen; Gerhard Adam; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Arndt Klocke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Noninvasive in vivo small animal MRI and MRS: basic experimental procedures.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; David Marcinek
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises.

Authors:  Thoralf Niendorf; Daniel K Sodickson; Gabriele A Krombach; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computed tomography in patients with cardiac pacemakers: difficulties and solutions.

Authors:  Rafal Mlynarski; Maciej Sosnowski; Agnieszka Mlynarska; Michał Tendera
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Predicting clinical outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients using early noncontrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Ona Wu; Leonardo M Batista; Fabricio O Lima; Mark G Vangel; Karen L Furie; David M Greer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  The application of in utero magnetic resonance imaging in the study of the metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of the developmental origins of health and disease.

Authors:  Stephanie A Giza; Simran Sethi; Lauren M Smith; Mary-Ellen E T Empey; Lindsay E Morris; Charles A McKenzie
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Patients' perceptions and attitude towards MRI safety in Asir Region, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Magbool Alelyani; Moawia Gameraddin; Azah Alasmari; Fay Alshahrani; Nada Alqahtani; Alamin Musa
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.