Literature DB >> 3357971

Superficial- and deep-tissue temperature increases in anesthetized dogs during exposure to high specific absorption rates in a 1.5-T MR imager.

W P Shuman1, D R Haynor, A W Guy, G E Wesbey, D J Schaefer, A A Moss.   

Abstract

Superficial- and deep-tissue heating was measured in five dogs during high-specific-absorption-rate radiofrequency (RF) irradiation to see whether significant temperature changes could be produced by a 1.5-T clinical magnetic resonance imager. The RF power output employed was 6.3 times that required for routine imaging. Temperature probes were placed in both deep and superficial tissues, and temperatures were recorded before, during, and after exposure. In each dog, there was a linear temperature increase of several degrees during RF exposure; the maximal average change was 4.6 degrees C in the urinary bladder. The temperature increase was slightly greater in deep tissues than in superficial tissues. The calculated specific absorption rate, based on the temperature change, averaged 7.9 W/kg for all five dogs. These findings argue for continued caution in the design and operation of imagers capable of high specific absorption rates, particularly when they are used for imaging infants or patients with altered thermoregulatory capability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3357971     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.167.2.3357971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Fast MRI of RF heating via phase difference mapping.

Authors:  Erik M Shapiro; Arijitt Borthakur; Michael J Shapiro; Ravinder Reddy; John S Leigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Parallel transmission RF pulse design with strict temperature constraints.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz; Giuseppe Carluccio; Christopher Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  In vivo radiofrequency heating in swine in a 3T (123.2-MHz) birdcage whole body coil.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Lynn Utecht; Jinfeng Tian; John Hughes; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

Review 5.  Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  A Stecco; A Saponaro; A Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.