Literature DB >> 7496710

An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.

P Glover1, J Hykin, P Gowland, J Wright, I Johnson, P Mansfield.   

Abstract

In order to assess the sound level experienced by the fetal ear during obstetric magnetic resonance imaging, a fluid filled stomach was used as an experimental model of the gravid uterus. A better than 30 dB attenuation in intensity was recorded across the frequency band of interest for all patient orientations. This was enough to reduce acoustic sound pressure from a level close to the instantaneous damage threshold (120 dB), to an acceptable level (< 90 dB). Direct mechanical coupling through the patient table was also shown to increase uterine sound pressure levels by as much as 10 dB. Much higher peak pressures could be obtained by tapping of abdomen with the fingers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7496710     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-814-1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

1.  Fetal brain activity and hemodynamic response to a vibroacoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Jonathan Fulford; Shantala H Vadeyar; Sanani H Dodampahala; Stephen Ong; Rachel J Moore; Philip N Baker; David K James; Penny Gowland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Antenatal determination of fetal brain activity in response to an acoustic stimulus using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R J Moore; S Vadeyar; J Fulford; D J Tyler; C Gribben; P N Baker; D James; P A Gowland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1.

Authors:  O A Glenn; A J Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 5.  The challenges of neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrea Edwards; Topun Austin; Martin J Graves; David J Lomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-11

6.  Measuring human placental blood flow with multidelay 3D GRASE pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling at 3T.

Authors:  Xingfeng Shao; Dapeng Liu; Thomas Martin; Teresa Chanlaw; Sherin U Devaskar; Carla Janzen; Aisling M Murphy; Daniel Margolis; Kyunghyun Sung; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Imaging of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy and the Peripartum Period.

Authors:  Theodore Pierce; Meline Hovnanian; Sandeep Hedgire; Brian Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-11-14

8.  [Radiology and pregnancy. Principles, general requirements and exposure].

Authors:  G Weisser; V Steil; K W Neff; K A Büsing
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Fetal Echoplanar Imaging: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Onur Afacan; Judy A Estroff; Edward Yang; Carol E Barnewolt; Susan A Connolly; Richard B Parad; Robert V Mulkern; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-10

Review 10.  Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  A Stecco; A Saponaro; A Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.