Literature DB >> 18789469

Modeling of the acoustic response from contrast agent microbubbles near a rigid wall.

Alexander A Doinikov1, Shukui Zhao, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

In ultrasonic targeted imaging, specially designed encapsulated microbubbles are used, which are capable of selectively adhering to the target site in the body. A challenging problem is to distinguish the echoes from such adherent agents from echoes produced by freely circulating agents. In the present paper, an equation of radial oscillation for an encapsulated bubble near a plane rigid wall is derived. The equation is then used to simulate the echo from a layer of contrast agents localized on a wall. The echo spectrum of adherent microbubbles is compared to that of free, randomly distributed microbubbles inside a vessel, in order to examine differences between the acoustic responses of free and adherent agents. It is shown that the fundamental spectral component of adherent bubbles is perceptibly stronger than that of free bubbles. This increase is accounted for by a more coherent summation of echoes from adherent agents and the acoustic interaction between the agents and the wall. For cases tested, the increase of the fundamental component caused by the above two effects is on the order of 8-9 dB. Bubble aggregates, which are observed experimentally to form near a wall due to secondary Bjerknes forces, increase the intensity of the fundamental component only if they are formed by bubbles whose radii are well below the resonant radius. If the formation of aggregates contributes to the growth of the fundamental component, the increase can exceed 17 dB. Statistical analysis for the comparison between adhering and free bubbles, performed over random space bubble distributions, gives p-values much smaller than 0.05.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18789469      PMCID: PMC2807700          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  23 in total

Review 1.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents. Progess and opportunities for clinical and research applications.

Authors:  Susannah H Bloch; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

3.  Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Mark Borden; Susannah H Bloch; Dustin Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.

Authors:  Esra Talu; Kanaka Hettiarachchi; Shukui Zhao; Robert L Powell; Abraham P Lee; Marjorie L Longo; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles.

Authors:  P J Frinking; N de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Model for bubble pulsation in liquid between parallel viscoelastic layers.

Authors:  Todd A Hay; Yurii A Ilinskii; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya; Mark F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of primary and secondary delays in the effective resonance frequency of acoustically interacting microbubbles.

Authors:  Hossein Haghi; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 9.336

3.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.