Literature DB >> 10790053

Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell

.   

Abstract

A model for the oscillation of gas bubbles encapsulated in a thin shell has been developed. The model depends on viscous and elastic properties of the shell, described by thickness, shear modulus, and shear viscosity. This theory was used to describe an experimental ultrasound contrast agent from Nycomed, composed of air bubbles encapsulated in a polymer shell. Theoretical calculations were compared with measurements of acoustic attenuation at amplitudes where bubble oscillations are linear. A good fit between measured and calculated results was obtained. The results were used to estimate the viscoelastic properties of the shell material. The shell shear modulus was estimated to between 10.6 and 12.9 MPa, the shell viscosity was estimated to between 0.39 and 0.49 Pas. The shell thickness was 5% of the particle radius. These results imply that the particles are around 20 times more rigid than free air bubbles, and that the oscillations are heavily damped, corresponding to Q-values around 1. We conclude that the shell strongly alters the acoustic behavior of the bubbles: The stiffness and viscosity of the particles are mainly determined by the encapsulating shell, not by the air inside.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790053     DOI: 10.1121/1.428557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  66 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; T Douglas Mast; Stephen R Perrin; Melvin E Klegerman; Shaoling Huang; Tyrone M Porter; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A model for the dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Dhiman Chatterjee; William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  DNA-coated microbubbles with biochemically tunable ultrasound contrast activity.

Authors:  Matthew A Nakatsuka; Mark J Hsu; Sadik C Esener; Jennifer N Cha; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Cell mechanics in biomedical cavitation.

Authors:  Qianxi Wang; Kawa Manmi; Kuo-Kang Liu
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Individual lipid encapsulated microbubble radial oscillations: Effects of fluid viscosity.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modeling of thermal effects in antivascular ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levenback; Chandra M Sehgal; Andrew K W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A new imaging strategy using wideband transient response of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Dustin E Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.